ArticleCurrent genomics2024
Detection and Quantification of 5moU RNA Modification from Direct RNA Sequencing Data.
Article in Current genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore direct RNA sequencing and the epitranscriptome: Advances in mapping native RNA landscapes.iMeta · 2026Review
- Advances in Detecting RNA Modifications Using Direct RNA Nanopore Sequencing.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- DirectRM: integrated detection of landscape and crosstalk between multiple RNA modifications using direct RNA sequencing.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemically modified therapeutic mRNAs have gained momentum recently. In addition to commonly used modifications ( Materials and Methods: Nanopore direct RNA sequencing data from both 5moU-modified and unmodified control samples were collected. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis and modeling of signal event characteristics (mean, median current intensities, standard deviations, and dwell times) were performed. Furthermore, classical machine learning algorithms, notably the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost were employed to discern 5moU modifications within NNUNN (where N represents A, C, U, or G) 5-mers. Results: Notably, the signal event attributes pertaining to each constituent base of the NNUNN 5-mers, in conjunction with the utilization of the XGBoost algorithm, exhibited remarkable performance levels (with a maximum AUROC of 0.9567 in the "AGTTC" reference 5-mer dataset and a minimum AUROC of 0.8113 in the "TGTGC" reference 5-mer dataset). This accomplishment markedly exceeded the efficacy of the prevailing background error comparison model (ELIGOs AUC 0.751 for site-level prediction). The model's performance was further validated through a series of curated datasets, which featured customized modification ratios designed to emulate broader data patterns, demonstrating its general applicability in quality control of IVT mRNA vaccines. The NanoML-5moU framework is publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/JiayiLi21/NanoML-5moU). Conclusion: NanoML-5moU enables accurate read-level profiling of 5moU modification with nanopore direct RNA-sequencing, which is a powerful tool specialized in unveiling signal patterns in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.