Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086992›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2024

Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH

Emmanuel Nwanebu, Mara Jezernik, Christopher Lawson, Guillaume Bruant, Boris Tartakovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emmanuel NwanebuEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Centre, National Research Council Canada 6100 Royalmount Avenue Montreal Quebec H4P 2R2 Canada Boris.Tartakovsky@cnrc-nrc.gc.ca.
Mara JezernikDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto Toronto Canada.
Christopher LawsonDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto Toronto Canada.
Guillaume BruantEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Centre, National Research Council Canada 6100 Royalmount Avenue Montreal Quebec H4P 2R2 Canada Boris.Tartakovsky@cnrc-nrc.gc.ca.
Boris TartakovskyEnergy, Mining and Environment Research Centre, National Research Council Canada 6100 Royalmount Avenue Montreal Quebec H4P 2R2 Canada Boris.Tartakovsky@cnrc-nrc.gc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6588-3276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L

Identifiers

PMID39086992
PMCPMC11290334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.