ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2024
Pre-cooling for Reducing Pain from Local Anesthetic Injections for Hemorrhoidectomy: An Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Trial.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Excisional hemorrhoidectomy (EH) is sometimes same-day surgery under local anesthesia (LA); however, the LA injection can be painful. We conducted an open-label, crossover, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pre-cooling in reducing pain associated with LA injection. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 20 years undergoing bilateral EH were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 pre-cooling sequences: a cooling-first sequence and a cooling-second sequence. In the first intervention phase, 2 minutes of pre-cooling was applied before LA injection in patients randomized to the cooling-first sequence; patients in the cooling-second sequence were asked to wait for 2 minutes (without pre-cooling) before LA injection. The pre-cooling sequences and the perianal sides targeted for injection were reversed in the second intervention phase. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) rating for pain from LA injection, which was obtained twice for each patient. Adverse events due to pre-cooling (e.g., skin disorders) were documented. Results: Of 114 screened patients, 51 were randomized to the cooling-first (n = 26; analyzed: n = 26) or cooling-second sequence (n = 25; analyzed: n = 25). The 2-minute pre-cooling was completed by 48 patients (94%). VAS scores for LA injection pain decreased significantly with pre-cooling compared to without (difference estimate, -1.71; 95% confidence interval, -2.12 to -1.31; p< 0.001). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Two minutes of skin pre-cooling effectively and safely reduces LA injection pain in patients undergoing EH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.