Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086830›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Rapid species discrimination of similar insects using hyperspectral imaging and lightweight edge artificial intelligence.

Xuquan Wang, Zhiyuan Ma, Yujie Xing, Tianfan Peng, Xiong Dun, Zhuqing He, Jian Zhang, Xinbin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuquan WangMOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5962-7193
Zhiyuan MaMOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.
Yujie XingMOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.
Tianfan PengMOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.
Xiong DunMOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.
Zhuqing HeEast China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, People's Republic of China.
Jian ZhangEast China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-6267
Xinbin ChengMOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species discrimination of insects is an important aspect of ecology and biodiversity research. The traditional methods based on human visual experience and biochemical analysis cannot strike a balance between accuracy and timeliness. Morphological identification using computer vision and machine learning is expected to solve this problem, but image features have poor accuracy for very similar species and usually require complicated networks that are unfriendly to portable edge devices. In this work, we propose a fast and accurate species discrimination method of similar insects using hyperspectral features and lightweight machine learning algorithm. Feature regions selection, feature spectra selection and model quantification are used for the optimization of discriminating network. The experimental results of six similar butterfly species in the genus of

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkedge artificial intelligencehyperspectral imaginginsect species discrimination

Identifiers

PMID39086830
PMCPMC11288683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.