Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Acceptance of electronic referrals across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: results from a national e-health database.

Abdullah A Alharbi, Nawfal A Aljerian, Meshary S Binhotan, Hani A Alghamdi, Reem S AlOmar, Ali K Alsultan, Mohammed S Arafat, Abdulrahman Aldhabib, Ahmed I Aloqayli, Eid B Alwahbi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abdullah A AlharbiFamily and Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Nawfal A AljerianSaudi Medical Appointment and Referrals Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meshary S BinhotanKing Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hani A AlghamdiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem S AlOmarDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Ali K AlsultanSaudi Medical Appointment and Referrals Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed S ArafatSaudi Medical Appointment and Referrals Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AldhabibSaudi Medical Appointment and Referrals Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed I AloqayliSaudi Medical Appointment and Referrals Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Eid B AlwahbiSaudi Medical Appointment and Referrals Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed K AlabdulaaliMinistry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: An effective referral system is necessary to ensure quality and an optimum continuum of care. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, an e-referral system known as the Saudi Medical Appointments and Referrals Centre (SMARC), has been fully functioning since 2019. This study aims to explore the rate of medical e-referral request acceptance in the KSA, and to study the factors associated with acceptance. Methods: This period cross-sectional study utilised secondary collected data from the SMARC e-referral system. The data spans both 2020 and 2021 and covers the entirety of the KSA. Bivariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to compute adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of the total 632,763 referral requests across the 2 years, 469,073 requests (74.13%) were accepted. Absence of available machinery was a significant predictor for referral acceptance compared to other reasons. Acceptance was highest for children under 14 with 28,956 (75.48%) and 63,979 (75.48%) accepted referrals, respectively. Patients requiring critical care from all age groups also had the highest acceptance including 6,237 referrals for paediatric intensive care unit (83.54%) and 34,126 referrals for intensive care unit (79.65%). All lifesaving referrals, 42,087 referrals, were accepted (100.00%). Psychiatric patients were observed to have the highest proportion for accepted referrals with 8,170 requests (82.50%) followed by organ transplantations with 1,005 requests (80.92%). Sex was seen to be a significant predictor for referrals, where the odds of acceptances for females increased by 2% compared to their male counterparts (95% CI = 1.01-1.04). Also, proportion of acceptance was highest for the Eastern business unit compared to all other units. External referrals were 32% less likely to be accepted than internal referrals (95% CI = 0.67-0.69). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that the e-referral system is mostly able to cater to the health services of the most vulnerable of patients. However, there remains areas for health policy improvement, especially in terms of resource allocation.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSaudi ArabiaYoung Adultdigital health transformatione-referralspublic health policytele-healththe Kingdom of Saudi Arabiathe Saudi Medical Appointments and Referrals Centre

Identifiers

PMID39086803
PMCPMC11288938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.