Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086778›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Cauda Equina Syndrome Management During Pregnancy.

Chinedu Egu, Samuel Akintunde, Motunrayo Adekoya, Edidiong Essiet, Spyridon Komaitis, Elie Najjar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cauda equina syndrome following vaginal delivery.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chinedu EguCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Samuel AkintundeCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Motunrayo AdekoyaCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Edidiong EssietCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Spyridon KomaitisCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Elie NajjarCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cauda equina during pregnancy represents a rare entity, with data regarding optimal treatment being very scarce in the pertinent literature. Given the scarcity of current evidence on the topic, this study conducts a systematic review and analysis of existing literature concerning cauda equina syndrome (CES) management in pregnant women. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, yielding 26 level IV peer-reviewed articles that met the inclusion criteria. These studies collectively encompassed 30 pregnant patients with CES, with a mean age of 31.2 years and an average gestational age of 26 weeks. Disc herniation emerged as the primary cause in 73% of cases. Regarding surgical interventions, the prone position was utilised in 70% of cases, with 73% receiving general anaesthesia. Notably, third-trimester spinal surgeries exhibited a higher complete recovery rate compared to earlier trimesters. Minimally invasive spinal surgery demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of complete recovery and reduced risk of persistent post-operative symptoms when compared to open approaches. Moreover, patients undergoing caesarean section (CS) after spinal surgery reported higher rates of symptom resolution and lower symptom persistence compared to those with CS before spinal surgery or vaginal delivery post-spinal surgery. Despite these study's findings, the overall evidence base remains limited, precluding definitive conclusions. Consequently, the study underscores the importance of multidisciplinary team discussions to formulate optimal treatment strategies for pregnant individuals presenting with CES. This highlights a critical need for further research to expand the knowledge base and improve the guidance available for managing CES in pregnant populations.

Indexed as

cauda equina syndromefoetal outcomelumbar disc herniationpregnancyspinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID39086778
PMCPMC11289579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.