Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086752›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2024

Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for

Xue-Ping Huang, Yi-Juan Liu, Shao-Wei Lin, Yan-Feng Shao, Feng Qiu, Qing-Wu Qiu, Zhang-Kun Xu, Jin-Xian Chen, Liang-Huo Chen, Zhen-Qun Lin and 17 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Xue-Ping HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Yi-Juan LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Shao-Wei LinSchool of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Yan-Feng ShaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third People's Hospital of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Feng QiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Provincial Hospital North Brance Fujian Provincial Geriatric Hospital, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Qing-Wu QiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xiaoao Hospital, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Zhang-Kun XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The General Hospital of Fujian Energy Group, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Jin-Xian ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Zhangzhou, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China.
Liang-Huo ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Anxi Country Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Zhen-Qun LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of TCM, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China.
Wen-Hua DaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhangpu Hospital, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China.
Ming-Qing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China.
Qi JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Hospital of Nanping City, Nanping 353000, Fujian Province, China.
Zhong-Qin XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Nanping Second Hospital, Nanping 353000, Fujian Province, China.
Xian-Xing ChengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuyishan Municipal Hospital, Nanping 353000, Fujian Province, China.
Xiang-Fei ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fuzhou Changle District Hospital, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Wen-Bin YouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changle City Second Hospital, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changle City Second Hospital, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.
Long-Qin LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Wei-Xing LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fuding Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ningde 352000, Fujian Province, China.
Yong-Fu WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Liancheng Hospital, Longyan 364000, Fujian Province, China.
Fu-Jin LaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xiapu County Hospital, Ningde 352000, Fujian Province, China.
Long-Qun ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jinjiang Second Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Zhong-Hua HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China.
Wen-Qi ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Putian Fude Hospital, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China.
Jin-Qi WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhi-Hui LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, Fujian Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VAT) in the treatment of

aimTo evaluate the efficacy of VAT in the Chinese population.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, and two-stage study was conducted at 23 centers in Fujian, China (May 2021-April 2022).

resultsIn the first stage, VAT-7 and BQT-V groups were selected for early termination because less than 23 among 28 cases were eradicated. In the second stage, the eradication rates for BQT, VAT-10, and VA-14 were 80.2% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 71.4%-86.8%], 93.2% (86.6%-96.7%), 92.2% (85.3%-96.0%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 80.9% (95%CI: 71.7%-87.5%), 94.0% (87.5%-97.2%), and 93.9% (87.4%-97.2%) in the per-protocol analysis. The ITT analysis showed a higher eradication rate in the VAT-10 and VAT-14 groups than in the BQT group (

conclusionVAT with a duration of 10 or 14 days achieves a higher eradication rate than the BQT, with a more tolerable safety profile in

Indexed as

AmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesAdultAgedChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanamineAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesAmoxicillinBismuth quadruple therapyDual therapyHelicobacter pyloriVonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID39086752
PMCPMC11287422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.