Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086711›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2024

Comparing the Efficiency of Single versus Dual Ultrasonic Devices for Metallic Post Removal in Endodontic Retreatment: A Clinical Study.

Key Fabiano Souza Pereira, Lia Beatriz Junqueira-Verardo, Edilson José Zafalon, Luiz Fernando Tomazinho, Vanessa Rodrigues do Nascimento, Hugo José Santos Bastos, Alex Yoshiharu Otani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Key Fabiano Souza PereiraDepartment of Endodontics, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Lia Beatriz Junqueira-VerardoPrivate Practice, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Edilson José ZafalonDepartment of Endodontics, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando TomazinhoDepartment of Endodontics, University of Paraná, Brazil; d.
Vanessa Rodrigues do NascimentoDepartment of Endodontics, University of Paraná, Brazil; d.
Hugo José Santos BastosPrivate Practice, Barreiras, Brazil.
Alex Yoshiharu OtaniDepartment of Endodontics, Paulista University, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasonic vibration for metallic post removal seems to be a unanimous choice between endodontists and general practitioners for providing the best results and having the highest safety. This study compared the time required by ultrasonic vibration for removing metallic post (MP) when 1 or 2 ultrasonics devices are used. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifteen teeth with MPs from 105 patients, indicated for nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were divided into 2 groups according to the number of ultrasonic devices used (G1-1 device) and (G2-2 devices). In G1, the MP was worn with a transmetal bur, alongside the wear of the cement line (around 2 mm deep). Then, an ultrasonic tip attached to an ultrasonic unit, with a power of 100% was activated at the level of the post, with constant water spray at a level of 1 mm above the axial surface of the tooth. The position of the tip was changed between buccal and lingual surfaces every 10 seconds until the MP was removed. In G2 the same procedures were performed as described in G1, but two ultrasonic tips were activated simultaneously at buccal and lingual surfaces until the MP was removed. The vibration time necessary for removing each MP was recorded using a chronometer. Results: The mean time was 131.10±29.68 seconds (mean±standard error of the mean) for MP removal using one ultrasonic device, and 24.86±6.88 seconds for two devices. The time required for MP removal using two ultrasonic devices was significantly less than when using one ultrasonic device ( Conclusion: The technique with 2 ultrasonic devices proved to be more efficient than the one using only 1 ultrasonic device.

Indexed as

EndodonticsMetallic Post RemovalPost and Core TechniqueRetreatmentUltrasonic Vibrations

Identifiers

PMID39086711
PMCPMC11287037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.