Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Influence of non-pharmaceutical interventions on epidemiological characteristics of

Min Jiang, Hui Zhang, Fangfang Yao, Qinhong Lu, Qian Sun, Zhen Liu, Qingcao Li, Guangliang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Post-pandemic resurgence and collapse ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Epidemiological changes ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Positive rates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Min Jiang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Hui Zhang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ninghai County Chengguan Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Fangfang YaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Qinhong LuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Qian SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Zhen LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Qingcao LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Guangliang WuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, China has implemented a series of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), effectively containing the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as various respiratory pathogens. With the continuous relaxation of restrictions, China has entered a new phase of the post-pandemic era. However, the epidemiological differences of Methods: Data of children aged 0-14 years who visited the Ningbo Medical Center LiHuiLi Hospital due to acute respiratory tract infections from January 2020 to December 2023 were collected. PCR was used to detect 13 respiratory pathogens and the macrolide-resistance of Results: Among 10,206 children, 2,360 were infected with MP (23.12%). Among the total, the MP positive rate during the NPI phase (6.35%) was significantly lower than that during the non-NPI phase (34.28%), while the macrolide resistance rate increased from 62.5% (NPI phase) to 81.1% (non-NPI phase). The rate of MP co-infection increased from 11.2% (NPI phase) to 30.3% (non-NPI phase). MP infection exhibited obvious seasonality, with the highest prevalence in autumn (30.0%) followed by summer (23.6%). There were differences in MP positivity rates among different age groups, with the highest among school-age children at 39.5%. During the NPI phase, all age groups were less susceptible to MP, while during the non-NPI phase, the susceptible age for MP was 4-12 years, with 8 years being the most susceptible. The susceptible age for MP co-infection was 0-6 years. MP exhibited antagonistic effects against numerous pathogens. Compared to MP single infection, the proportion of pneumonia was higher in MP co-infection cases. Conclusion: The removal of NPIs significantly impacted the spread of MP, altering population characteristics including age, seasonality, macrolide resistance, and MP co-infection rates.

Indexed as

childrenCOVID-19epidemiological characteristicsMycoplasma pneumoniaeNPIs

Identifiers

PMID39086655
PMCPMC11288959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.