Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086633›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2024

Device-assisted enteroscopy: Are we ready to dismiss the spiral?

Alessandro Mussetto, Elettra Merola, Cesare Casadei, Daniele Salvi, Fabiola Fornaroli, Silvia Cocca, Margherita Trebbi, Armando Gabbrielli, Cristiano Spada, Andrea Michielan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandro MussettoDepartment of Gastroenterology, S Maria della Croci Hosp, Ravenna 48121, Italy.
Elettra MerolaDepartment of Gastroenterology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital (ASL Roma 3), Roma 00122, Italy.
Cesare CasadeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, S Maria della Croci Hosp, Ravenna 48121, Italy.
Daniele SalviSection of Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia 25124, Italy.
Fabiola FornaroliGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma 43125, Italy.
Silvia CoccaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena 41121, Italy.
Margherita TrebbiDepartment of Gastroenterology, S Maria della Croci Hosp, Ravenna 48121, Italy.
Armando GabbrielliCenter for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, Trento 38122, Italy.
Cristiano SpadaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Roma 00168, Italy.
Andrea MichielanGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento 38122, Italy. andrea.michielan@apss.tn.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is the latest advance in device-assisted enteroscopy. Adverse events related to MSE were discussed in a recent large systematic review and meta-analysis and were directly compared with those of balloon enteroscopy in a case-matched study and a randomized controlled trial. Following the real-life application of MSE, an unexpected safety issue emerged regarding esophageal injury and the technique has been withdrawn from the global market, despite encouraging results in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield. We conducted an Italian multicenter real-life prospective study, which was prematurely terminated after the withdrawal of MSE from the market. The primary goals were the evaluation of MSE performance (both diagnostic and therapeutic) and its safety in routine endoscopic practice, particularly in the early phase of introduction in the endoscopic unit. A subanalysis, which involved patients who underwent MSE after unsuccessful balloon enteroscopy, demonstrated, for the first time, the promising performance of MSE as a rescue procedure. Given its remarkable performance in clinical practice and its potential role as a backup technique following a previously failed enteroscopy, it may be more appropriate to refine and enhance MSE in the future rather than completely abandoning it.

Indexed as

Balloon EnteroscopyAdultAgedEndoscopes, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophagusFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAdverse eventsAGREE classificationDiagnostic yieldMotorized spiral enteroscopyRescue enteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39086633
PMCPMC11287405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.