Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086615›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2024

Oxaliplatin-associated shock in stage III colorectal cancer patients: real-world evidence in Taiwan.

Ling-Yi Wang, Hui-Hsia Hsieh, Sung-Chao Chu, Wei-Chuan Chang, Yi-Ting Kuo, Tien-Yuan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ling-Yi WangGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Hui-Hsia HsiehDepartment of Pharmacy, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Sung-Chao ChuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien City, Taiwan.
Wei-Chuan ChangEpidemiology and Biostatistics Consulting Center, Department of Medical Research, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien City, Taiwan.
Yi-Ting KuoDepartment of Pharmacy, Taipei City Hospital Zhongxiao Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Tien-Yuan WuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wuxing Street, Taipei City 110301, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5205-4567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oxaliplatin-associated shock (referred to as shock) is a rare but life-threatening adverse event. Objectives: This pioneering cohort study aimed to quantitatively investigate the association between oxaliplatin use and shock in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC), identify potential independent risk factors for shock, and assess the cycle-to-shock during oxaliplatin treatment. Design: The study utilized a nested case-control (NCC) design to assess the association between oxaliplatin and shock and employed a case-crossover approach to address unmeasured confounders. Methods: All newly diagnosed stage III CRC patients were identified from the CRC Health Database (2012-2016). Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for oxaliplatin's link to shock incidence. Results: Among 6932 oxaliplatin recipients, 331 suffered shock. In all, 3309 controls were selected Conclusion: Oxaliplatin use significantly increased shock risk in stage III CRC patients. Male sex and heart disease are two independent risk factors.

Indexed as

adverse eventcolorectal canceroxaliplatinpharmacovigilanceshock

Identifiers

PMID39086615
PMCPMC11289823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.