ArticleWorld journal of radiology2024
Evaluating the role of 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery: Trends in literature since clinical approval.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-high-field 7-Tesla MRI in neuro-oncology: a narrative review of current applications and future directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter approval for clinical use in 2017, early investigations of ultra-high-field abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated its feasibility as well as diagnostic capabilities in neuroimaging. However, there are no to few systematic reviews covering the entirety of its neurosurgical applications as well as the trends in the literature with regard to the aforementioned application.
aimTo assess the impact of 7-Tesla MRI (7T MRI) on neurosurgery, focusing on its applications in diagnosis, treatment planning, and postoperative assessment, and to systematically analyze and identify patterns and trends in the existing literature related to the utilization of 7T MRI in neurosurgical contexts.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed was conducted for studies published between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023, using MeSH terms related to 7T MRI and neurosurgery. The inclusion criteria were: Studies involving patients of all ages, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and original research. The exclusion criteria were: Pre-prints, studies with insufficient data (
resultsWe identified 219 records from PubMed within our defined period, with no duplicates or exclusions before screening. After screening, 125 articles were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria, leaving 94 reports. Of these, 2 were irrelevant to neurosurgery and 7 were animal studies, resulting in 85 studies included in our systematic review. Data were categorized by neurosurgical procedures and diseases treated using 7T MRI. We also analyzed publications by country and the number of 7T MRI facilities per country was also presented. Experimental studies were classified into comparison and non-comparison studies based on whether 7T MRI was compared to lower field strengths.
conclusion7T MRI holds great potential in improving the characterization and understanding of various neurological and psychiatric conditions that may be neurosurgically treated. These include epilepsy, pituitary adenoma, Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular diseases, trigeminal neuralgia, traumatic head injury, multiple sclerosis, glioma, and psychiatric disorders. Superiority of 7T MRI over lower field strengths was demonstrated in terms of image quality, lesion detection, and tissue characterization. Findings suggest the need for accelerated global distribution of 7T magnetic resonance systems and increased training for radiologists to ensure safe and effective integration into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.