ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2024
Serum miR-23 and miR-150 Profiles as Biomarkers for Predicting Recurrence following Surgical Intervention in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing circulating miR-1246 as a diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer: Insights from a meta-analysis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Platelet-Derived circRNAs hsa_circ_0004771 and hsa_circ_0019120 Differentially Expressed in Colorectal Cancer and Polyps.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024Article
- Hydroalcoholic Sumac Extract as a Protective Agent Against X-Ray-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024Article
- Modelling of miRNA-mRNA Network to Identify Gene Signatures with Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Gastric Cancer: Evidence fromReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play pivotal roles in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression and have emerged as crucial regulators in cancer development, progression, and metastasis. This study aimed to assess the expression profiles of miR-23, miR-223, miR-1246, and miR-150 in serum samples obtained from colorectal cancer (CRC) patients before and three months after surgery, in comparison to a healthy control group, to explore their biomarker potential. Methods: A total of 50 blood samples were collected from patients with CRC (pre- and post-surgery), along with 50 samples from healthy controls. The relative expression levels of miR-23, miR-223, miR-1246, and miR-150 in the serum were quantified using quantitative real-time PCR. Results: Our findings revealed upregulated expression levels of miR-23, miR-1246, and miR-223, while miR-150 exhibited significant downregulation in the serum of CRC subjects compared to healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that miR-23 and miR-150 could distinguish CRC cases from controls with relatively high accuracy. Moreover, three months post-surgery, miR-23, miR-1246, and miR-223 serum levels were downregulated, and miR-150 was significantly upregulated. However, no significant correlations were observed between serum levels of the studied genes and the clinical features of our patients. Conclusions: The serum levels of miR-23 and miR-150 hold promise as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.