ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Utility of Serial Microbial Cell-free DNA Sequencing for Inpatient and Outpatient Pathogen Surveillance Among Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical utility of serial plasma cell-free DNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing assays.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026Observational
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Bloodstream Infections: Shaping the Future of Rapid Diagnostics and Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Plasma mcfDNA Sequencing May Improve Usual Care Diagnostics to Detect HHV-8 Among Outpatient People with Advanced HIV.Pathogens & immunity · 2024Article
- Clinical utility of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing in determining microbiologic etiology of infectious syndromes in solid organ transplant recipients.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
- Clinical impact of microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing for invasive mold infection-a single-center retrospective observational study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study characterizes the clinical utility and validity of the Karius test (KT), a plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing platform, as an infection surveillance tool among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients, including monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and detecting infections relative to standard microbiologic testing (SMT). Methods: A prospective, observational cohort study was performed among adult HCT recipients as inpatients and outpatients. Serial KTs were performed starting with 1 sample within 14 days before HCT, then weekly from 7-63 days posttransplant then monthly from 3-12 months post-HCT. Diagnostic performance of KT versus CMV polymerase chain reaction was evaluated with positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement. Infectious events (<12 months post-HCT) were extracted from medical records. For infectious events without positive SMT, 2 clinicians adjudicated KT results to determine if any detections were a probable cause. Difference in time from KT pathogen detection and infection onset was calculated. Results: Of the 70 participants, mean age was 49.9 years. For CMV surveillance, positive percent agreement was 100% and negative percent agreement was 90%. There was strong correlation between CMV DNA and KT molecules per microliter ( Conclusions: KT detected CMV with high accuracy and correlation with quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Among infectious events, KT demonstrated additive clinical utility by detecting pathogens earlier than SMT and those not detected by SMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.