Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086382›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024

Minimally Invasive Surgery For Management of Bunionette Deformity (Tailor's Bunion) Using Fifth Metatarsal Osteotomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Thomas L Lewis, Peter Lam, Yousif Alkhalfan, Robbie Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas L LewisKing's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4167-7427
Peter LamOrthopaedic and Arthritis Specialist Centre, Chatswood, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7934-6546
Yousif AlkhalfanGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom.
Robbie RayKing's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-9720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive osteotomy techniques for bunionette correction. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following percutaneous or minimally invasive surgery for bunionette deformity correction. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. All clinical studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library Database from inception until December 2023 reporting on the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive osteotomy techniques for bunionette deformity correction were included. The primary outcome was radiographic deformity correction. A meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed to assess the mean difference following surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: A total of 942 potential studies were identified, of which 18 were included encompassing 714 feet in 580 patients. There were no comparative studies identified. The majority of studies (n = 14/18) used an unfixed distal osteotomy technique. All studies showed a statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score and visual analog scale for pain) and radiologic outcomes (fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle and fifth metatarsophalangeal angle). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 21.4%. The nonunion rate was 0% to 5.6%. Overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The most common complication was development of a hypertrophic callus that tended to resorb over time without needing further surgical intervention. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review must be considered in light of the methodologic limitations of the studies analyzed-including additional procedures performed at the same time as the bunionette correction, lack of comparative studies, and heterogeneity of the case series included. Despite these limitations, our review suggests that percutaneous techniques for bunionette deformity correction are generally clinically safe and associated with improvement in radiographic alignment and patient-reported outcome measures.

Indexed as

Bunionettefifth metatarsalfoot deformitymetatarsal osteotomyminimally invasiveoutcomes assessmentpercutaneous surgerysoft tissue releasesurgical correctionTailor’s bunion

Identifiers

PMID39086382
PMCPMC11289809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.