ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
Predicting potential microbe-disease associations based on dual branch graph convolutional network.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RGTBind: RBF-gate graph transformer with spatially biased attention for protein-DNA binding-site prediction.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Working together: gut microbe-microbe interactions shape host inflammation.Infection and immunity · 2025Review
- Predicting potential microbe-disease associations based on dual branch graph convolutional network.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying the association between microbes and diseases not only aids in the prevention and diagnosis of diseases, but also provides crucial theoretical support for new drug development and personalized treatment. Due to the time-consuming and costly nature of laboratory-based biological tests to confirm the relationship between microbes and diseases, there is an urgent need for innovative computational frameworks to anticipate new associations between microbes and diseases. Here, we propose a novel computational approach based on a dual branch graph convolutional network (GCN) module, abbreviated as DBGCNMDA, for identifying microbe-disease associations. First, DBGCNMDA calculates the similarity matrix of diseases and microbes by integrating functional similarity and Gaussian association spectrum kernel (GAPK) similarity. Then, semantic information from different biological networks is extracted by two GCN modules from different perspectives. Finally, the scores of microbe-disease associations are predicted based on the extracted features. The main innovation of this method lies in the use of two types of information for microbe/disease similarity assessment. Additionally, we extend the disease nodes to address the issue of insufficient features due to low data dimensionality. We optimize the connectivity between the homogeneous entities using random walk with restart (RWR), and then use the optimized similarity matrix as the initial feature matrix. In terms of network understanding, we design a dual branch GCN module, namely GlobalGCN and LocalGCN, to fine-tune node representations by introducing side information, including homologous neighbour nodes. We evaluate the accuracy of the DBGCNMDA model using five-fold cross-validation (5-fold-CV) technique. The results show that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and area under the precision versus recall curve (AUPR) of the DBGCNMDA model in the 5-fold-CV are 0.9559 and 0.9630, respectively. The results from the case studies using published experimental data confirm a significant number of predicted associations, indicating that DBGCNMDA is an effective tool for predicting potential microbe-disease associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.