Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086041›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2024

Informing the development of antipsychotic-induced weight gain management guidance: patient experiences and preferences - qualitative descriptive study.

Ita Fitzgerald, Erin K Crowley, Ciara Ní Dhubhlaing, Sarah O'Dwyer, Laura J Sahm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hunger pain and its reduction; qualitative insight from people with schizophrenia on semaglutide.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  3. Eating Behaviour in Mental Health Care: An Underexplored Perspective From Dietitians and Other Clinicians.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-pharmacologicaL InterVEntions for Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain (RESOLVE) in People Living With Severe Mental Illness: A Realist Synthesis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ita FitzgeraldPharmacy Department, St Patrick's Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland; and Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9570-8823
Erin K CrowleyPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ciara Ní DhubhlaingPharmacy Department, St Patrick's Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland; and College of Mental Health Pharmacy, Burgess Hill, UK.
Sarah O'DwyerDepartment of Medicine, St Patrick's Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland.
Laura J SahmPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; and Pharmacy Department, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) is a substantial contributor to high obesity rates in psychiatry. Limited management guidance exists to inform clinical practice, and individuals with experience of managing AIWG have had no or minimal input into its development. A lack of empirical research outlining patient values and preferences for management also exists. Recommendations addressing weight management in psychiatry may be distinctly susceptible to ideology and sociocultural values regarding intervention appropriateness and expectations of self-management, reinforcing the need for co-produced management guidance. This study is the first to ask: how do individuals conceptualise preferred AIWG management and how can this be realised in practice?

aims1. Explore the management experiences of individuals with unwanted AIWG. 2. Elicit their values and preferences regarding preferred management.

methodQualitative descriptive methodology informed study design. A total of 17 participants took part in semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was undertaken using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants reported that clinicians largely overestimated AIWG manageability using dietary and lifestyle changes. They also reported difficulties accessing alternative management interventions, including a change in antipsychotic and/or pharmacological adjuncts. Participants reported current management guidance is oversimplified, lacks the specificity and scope required, and endorses a 'one-size-fits-all' management approach to an extensively heterogenous side-effect. Participants expressed a preference for collaborative AIWG management and guidance that prioritises early intervention using the range of evidence-based management interventions, tailored according to AIWG risk, participant ability and participant preference.

conclusionIntegration of this research into guideline development will help ensure recommendations are relevant and applicable, and that individual preferences are represented.

Indexed as

Antipsychotics and antipsychotic-induced weight gainguidelinehealth services researchpatient preferencesschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39086041
PMCPMC11698206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.