Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085925›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024

Varied cellular abnormalities in thin vs. normal endometrium in recurrent implantation failure by single-cell transcriptomics.

Xiaoying Fu, Xiaoyan Guo, Han Xu, Yini Li, Bihui Jin, Xirong Zhang, Chongyi Shu, Yuhang Fan, Yiqi Yu, Yuqing Tian and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Histochemical Assessment of Reticulin-Collagen Patterns in the Mid-Secretory Endometrium Predicts Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaoying Fu *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoyan Guo *Center for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Han Xu *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yini LiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Bihui JinCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xirong ZhangShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chongyi ShuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuhang FanCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yiqi YuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuqing TianCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiao TianCenter for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jing ShuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. shujing@hmc.edu.cn.

Funding

Co-construction Project from State and Zhejiang Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine GZY-ZJ-KJ-23058General Research Program for Medicine and Health of Zhejiang Province 2023KY021,2022RC104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReduced endometrium thickness and receptivity are two important reasons for recurrent implantation failure (RIF). In order to elucidate differences between these two types of endometrial defects in terms of molecular signatures, cellular interactions, and structural changes, we systematically investigated the single-cell transcriptomic atlas across three distinct groups: RIF patients with thin endometrium (≤ 6 mm, TE-RIF), RIF patients with normal endometrium thickness (≥ 8 mm, NE-RIF), and fertile individuals (Control).

methodsThe late proliferative and mid-secretory phases of the endometrium were collected from three individuals in the TE-RIF group, two in the NE-RIF group, and three in the control group. The study employed a combination of advanced techniques. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was utilized to capture comprehensive transcriptomic profiles at the single-cell level, providing insights into gene expression patterns within specific cell types. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy were employed to visualize ultrastructural details of the endometrial tissue, while hematoxylin and eosin staining facilitated the examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition. Immunohistochemistry techniques were also applied to detect and localize specific protein markers relevant to endometrial receptivity and function.

resultsThrough comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes among these groups and KEGG pathway analysis, the TE-RIF group exhibited notable dysregulations in the TNF and MAPK signaling pathways, which are pivotal in stromal cell growth and endometrial receptivity. Conversely, in the NE-RIF group, disturbances in energy metabolism emerged as a primary contributor to reduced endometrial receptivity. Additionally, using CellPhoneDB for intercellular communication analysis revealed aberrant interactions between epithelial and stromal cells, impacting endometrial receptivity specifically in the TE-RIF group.

conclusionOverall, our findings provide valuable insights into the heterogeneous molecular pathways and cellular interactions associated with RIF in different endometrial conditions. These insights may pave the way for targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at improving endometrial receptivity and enhancing reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing ART. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and translate them into clinical applications for personalized fertility treatments.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationEndometriumSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAdultFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansInfertility, FemalePregnancyRecurrent implantation failureSingle-cell sequencingThin endometrium

Identifiers

PMID39085925
PMCPMC11293141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.