Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085902›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

"They don't have the luxury of time": interviews exploring the determinants of public health research activity that contextualise embedded researcher roles in local government.

Rachael C Edwards, Dylan Kneale, Claire Stansfield, Sarah Lester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachael C EdwardsEvidence for Policy and Practice Information Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. rachael.edwards@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4717-7615
Dylan KnealeEvidence for Policy and Practice Information Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Claire StansfieldEvidence for Policy and Practice Information Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Sarah LesterEvidence for Policy and Practice Information Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research PR-R6-0113-11003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmbedded researchers are a novel intervention to improve the translation of research evidence into policy and practice settings, including public health. These roles are being implemented with increasing popularity, but they often lack clear evaluative frameworks. Understanding initial levels of research activity, including associated barriers and opportunities, is essential to developing theories of change and thus shaping the roles and defining expectations. We aimed to identify the principal determinants of research activity in public health that contextualise embedded researcher roles, including attributes of the embedded researcher themselves.

methodsWe undertook seventeen semi-structured interviews with embedded researchers in diverse public health settings in English local government. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsWe identified thirteen interlinked determinants of research activity within local government public health settings. Research and interpersonal skills, as well as pre-existing connections and knowledge within local government, were highly valued individual attributes for embedded researchers. Resource deficiencies (funding, time, and infrastructure) were primary barriers to research activity, whereas a strong local appetite for evidence informed decision making presented a valuable opportunity. However, there was inconsistencies across public health teams relating to perceptions of what constituted "research" and the resources that would be required.

conclusionsOur results suggest that successful embedded researchers will have equally strong research and communication skills and should be offered mentorship and clear career progression pathways. Perceptions of research within local government are closely linked to resource deficiencies and senior endorsement. Embedded researchers could benefit from taking the time to develop locally contextualised knowledge of this research culture. Theories of change for embedded researchers should conceptualise the interconnections across individual, interpersonal, and organisational barriers and opportunities underlying local government research activity. Further research is needed to identify methods for exploring the influence of embedded researchers as well as to unpack the stages of research activity within local government and the associated behaviours.

Indexed as

Local GovernmentPublic HealthResearch PersonnelCommunicationDecision MakingHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicMentorsProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchTranslational Research, BiomedicalEmbedded researcherEvidence useLocal governmentPublic healthResearch activity

Identifiers

PMID39085902
PMCPMC11292997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.