ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Rare disease clinical trials in the European Union: navigating regulatory and clinical challenges.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Basket trials in rare diseases: a systematic review of current practices, methodological challenges, and future directions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Pooled it
- A narrative review of the economic burden of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease and analogous conditions.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating Reproductive Health Recommendations in CPGs for Sickle Cell Disease: An Umbrella Review.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- Changes in motor function, quality of life, and clinical manifestations in patients with Alpha-mannosidosis treated with Velmanase Alfa: Data from the French Étoile Alpha registry.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Not all cancers are equal: uneven access to glioma clinical trials in Europe.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Article
- TrialR: critical enablers and the need for reusable Rare Disease Clinical Trial infrastructure in Western Australia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- What Matters Most? Developing a Core Patient Reported Outcome Set for Individuals With Genetic Intellectual Disabilities: An International Delphi Study.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
- Medicine Development and Access for Rare Diseases: Can We Do Better?Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
- Rare disease clinical trials in Italy (2022-May 2026): current trends, future challenges, and the evolving role as reporting member state.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Genomics in Health and Biomedicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- How social pharmaceutical innovations are addressing problems of availability, accessibility and affordability of drugs for rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- The EMA as a potential driver of competitiveness of orphan medicines in Europe: a focus on regulatory incentives and funding opportunities.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Pivotal Studies for Drugs About to Be Launched for Rare Diseases: Will They Better Support Health Technology Assessment and Market Access than in the Past?Journal of market access & health policy · 2025Article
- Precision therapies for genetic epilepsies in 2025: Promises and pitfalls.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Variance Estimation in Biopharmaceutical Processes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Visual Research of Global Orphan Drug from a Bibliometric Perspective.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical development for orphan drugs presents significant difficulties and challenges. There is no unique or standard design, conduct, and outcome assessment methodology and it is sometimes impractical to fit design models of rare disease trials in any practiced and well-known framework. In the European Union (EU) these challenges encompass a broad array of subjects, including trial design, study outcomes, patient recruitment, trial conduct ethics, trial cost, and chances of success. This literature-based review study aims to provide a thorough overview of the critical aspects of rare disease trials in the EU by analyzing the current landscape of rare disease trials, highlighting key challenges, delving into regulatory and research initiatives and innovation in trial designs, and proposing multi-faceted solutions to implement effective rare disease clinical trials in the region. DISCUSSION: Traditional clinical trial designs, validation, and evaluation methodologies used for nonorphan drugs often prove unsuitable for orphan drugs, given the small patient populations, sometimes fewer than 1000 cases. There is an increasing need for accessible therapies and both regulators as well as industry are trying to develop affordable and effective drugs to address this need. Despite several steps that have been taken, the timely development of drugs remains a challenge. One of the reasons behind the long development timeline is the recruitment, retention, and conduct of rare disease trials. To optimize the development timelines of orphan drugs in the EU, it is important to ensure that the safety and efficacy of the product is not compromised. Industry and regulatory agencies must implement innovative trial designs, devise flexible policies, and incorporate real-world data for assessing clinical outcomes.
conclusionCollaboration among academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies (both small and major), patient groups, and health authorities is crucial in overcoming obstacles related to clinical trials and providing assistance and creative ideas. The ultimate objective of granting rare disease patients timely and affordable access to medications with a positive balance between benefits and risks is to be met.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.