Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085888›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2024

Mosquito Shield™, a transfluthrin passive emanator, protects against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in central Benin.

Augustin Fongnikin, Juniace Ahoga, Boris Ndombidje, Corneille Hueha, Esperantos de Souza, Ruth Oti-Tossou, Renaud Govoetchan, Corine Ngufor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Augustin FongnikinCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Juniace AhogaCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Boris NdombidjeCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Corneille HuehaCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Esperantos de SouzaCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Ruth Oti-TossouCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Renaud GovoetchanCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Corine NguforCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin. corine.ngufor@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpatial repellents can provide personal and household protection against biting vector mosquitoes by volatizing repellents into the air within a given area. Mosquito Shield™ is a transfluthrin passive emanator undergoing evaluation for malaria control. Studies evaluating its entomological impact against different local malaria vector populations would help guide its deployment in endemic countries.

methodsA two-arm single-blinded small-scale household randomised entomological trial was conducted to assess the impact of Mosquito Shield™ on the human landing rate of wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) vector mosquitoes in houses in the Ganhoua village of the Zakpota District of central Benin. From a total of 30 houses, 15 were randomly allocated to receive Mosquito Shield™, while the remainder received a placebo product. The trial lasted through the life of the Mosquito Shield™ product (32 days). Mosquito sampling was performed by human landing catches at baseline and at 6 timepoints post-intervention (days 0-1, 7-8, 14-15, 21-22, 28-29 and 31-32). Collections were performed for 2 nights at each sampling time point. WHO cylinder bioassays were conducted during the trial with F1 An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes that emerged from larvae from the study area to assess the intensity of resistance to pyrethroids in the wild vector population.

resultsThe vector population in the study area showed a high intensity of resistance to pyrethroids. Baseline An. gambiae s.l. human landing rates were similar in houses in both study arms before product application (11.53/person/night vs 11.67/person/night, p > 0.05). A total of 5736 mosquitoes were collected in the placebo control arm and 3862 in the Mosquito Shield™ arm post-intervention. Overall An. gambiae s.l. post-intervention human landing rates were significantly lower in houses in the Mosquito Shield™ arm (18.13/person/night) compared to the houses in the placebo control arm (26.84/person/night, IRR = 0.658, p < 0.001). Over the lifespan of the product, Mosquito Shield™ provided a significant protective efficacy of 34.2% (22.1-44.4%, p < 0.001) against wild pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae s.l. vectors compared to the placebo. Human landing rates of other nuisance vector mosquito species (Culex and Mansonia) were also reduced in houses treated with Mosquito Shield™ compared to the placebo.

conclusionMosquito Shield™, a transfluthrin passive emanator, provided significant protection against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors to households in Benin. The spatial repellent shows potential to reduce malaria transmission by pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae s.l. vector mosquitoes and cover gaps in malaria control when deployed to complement existing vector control interventions.

Indexed as

AnophelesCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesInsect RepellentsMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPyrethrinsAnimalsBeninFemaleHumansMalariaSingle-Blind MethodCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsecticidesInsect RepellentsPyrethrinstransfluthrin

Identifiers

PMID39085888
PMCPMC11292991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.