Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085831›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Nurse-led web-based self-management program to improve patient activation and health outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain: an acceptability and feasibility pilot study.

Richard L Skolasky, Sarah Nolan, Raven Pierre, Paige Vinch, Janiece L Taylor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06236529 (Supporting Patient Activation for Self-Management of Chronic Low Back Pain With a Targeted Intervention Based on Key Influencing Characteristics), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06236529 nacompletednot on this map

Supporting Patient Activation for Self-Management of Chronic Low Back Pain With a Targeted Intervention Based on Key Influencing Characteristics

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled34ConditionsChronic Low-back Pain, Patient ActivationArmsHealth Behavior Change Counseling, Self-management program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard L SkolaskyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. rskolas1@jhmi.edu.
Sarah NolanJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Raven PierreJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paige VinchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Janiece L TaylorJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic low back (cLBP) pain report reduced physical function and ability to participate in social roles and are more likely to use opioid pain medications. While self-management interventions have been shown to support these patients, their effectiveness has been limited due to poor patient engagement. "Patient activation" encompasses the skills, knowledge, and motivation that a person has to manage their health. Supporting patient activation may improve the effectiveness of self-management for cLBP.

methodsIn this single-masked pilot study of adults with cLBP, patients were randomized to receive either no intervention (control) or 6 weekly sessions of an evidence-based web-based self-management program (SMP) with or without health behavior change counseling (HBCC) using motivational interviewing. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 12 and 26 weeks using the Patient Activation Measure, Oswestry Disability Index and PROMIS physical function, social role participation, and pain interference. We assessed acceptability and feasibility based on recruitment, session attendance, and follow-up.

resultsOf 187 individuals screened, 105 were eligible and 34 were randomized to control (n = 12), SMP (n = 4), or SMP + HBCC (n = 18). The population had 19 women, 22 patients married or living with significant other, 13 Black or African American patients, and 4 Hispanic or Latino patients. Participants had a mean (SD) Oswestry Disability Index score of 42 (12), moderate impairments in physical function (40 (6.6)) and social roles (45 (10)), and moderately severe pain interference (61 (6.7)). Of 22 participants receiving SMP sessions, 20 participated in at least 1, 15 participated in at least 3, and 7 participated in all 6 sessions. Loss to follow-up was 6 over the 26-week study. Participants in the SMP and SMP + HBCC groups had at least medium effect size improvements in Patient Activation Measures and small-to-medium effect size improvements in Oswestry Disability Index scores and physical function and large effect size improvement in social roles at 12 weeks. Improvements persisted in the SMP + HBCC group at 26 weeks.

conclusionsA web-based SMP is acceptable and feasible in this population. Participants who received augmentation with HBCC had persistent improvements in health outcomes at 26 weeks.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06236529 (2/1/2024 - retrospectively registered). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

Chronic low back painDisabilityPatient activationPhysical functionSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID39085831
PMCPMC11293200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.