Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085821›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care: a cross-sectional study in 30 health facilities in Tanzania.

Damas Juma, Ketil Stordal, Benjamin Kamala, Dunstan R Bishanga, Albino Kalolo, Robert Moshiro, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Rachel Manongi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Damas JumaKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. dajkay@gmail.com.
Ketil StordalDepartment of Pediatric Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Benjamin KamalaDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Manyara, Tanzania.
Dunstan R BishangaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Albino KaloloDepartment of Public Health, St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Robert MoshiroDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Manyara, Tanzania.
Jan Terje KvaløyDepartment of Mathematics and Physics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Rachel ManongiKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the global progress in bringing health services closer to the population, mothers and their newborns still receive substandard care leading to morbidity and mortality. Health facilities' capacity to deliver the service is a prerequisite for quality health care. This study aimed to assess health facilities' readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (CEmONC), comprising of blood transfusion, caesarean section and basic services, and hence to inform improvement in the quality of care interventions in Tanzania.

methodsA cross-sectional assessment of 30 CEmONC health facilities implementing the Safer Births Bundle of Care package in five regions of Tanzania was carried out between December 2020 and January 2021. We adapted the World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool to assess amenities, equipment, trained staff, guidelines, medicines, and diagnostic facilities. Composite readiness scores were calculated for each category and results were compared at the health facility level. For categorical variables, we tested for differences by Fisher's exact test; for readiness scores, differences were tested by a linear mixed model analysis, taking into account dependencies within the regions. We used p < 0.05 as our level of significance.

resultsThe overall readiness to provide CEmONC was 69.0% and significantly higher for regional hospitals followed by district hospitals. Average readiness was 78.9% for basic amenities, 76.7% for medical equipment, 76.0% for diagnosis and treatment commodities, 63.6% for staffing and 50.0% for guidelines. There was a variation in the availability of items at the individual health facility level and across levels of facilities. We found a significant difference in the availability of basic amenities, equipment, staffing, and guidelines between regional, and district hospitals and health centres (p = 0.05). Regional hospitals had significantly higher scores of medical equipment than district hospitals and health centers (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the availability of commodities for diagnosis and treatment between different facility levels.

conclusionFacilities' readiness was inadequate and varied across different levels of the facility. There is room to improve the facilities' readiness to deliver quality maternal and newborn care. The responsible authorities should take immediate actions to address the observed deficiencies while carefully choosing the most effective and feasible interventions and monitoring progress in readiness.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyQuality of Health CareTanzaniaFacility readinessMaternal careNeonatal careObstetricQuality of careSARA

Identifiers

PMID39085821
PMCPMC11290101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.