Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085781›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

DGCPPISP: a PPI site prediction model based on dynamic graph convolutional network and two-stage transfer learning.

Zijian Feng, Weihong Huang, Haohao Li, Hancan Zhu, Yanlei Kang, Zhong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zijian FengZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Smart Management and Application of Modern Agricultural Resources, School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Weihong HuangZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Smart Management and Application of Modern Agricultural Resources, School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Haohao LiCollege of Science, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China.
Hancan ZhuSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Information, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, 312000, Zhejiang, China.
Yanlei KangZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Smart Management and Application of Modern Agricultural Resources, School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Zhong LiZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Smart Management and Application of Modern Agricultural Resources, School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China. lizhong@zjhu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12171434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProteins play a pivotal role in the diverse array of biological processes, making the precise prediction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) sites critical to numerous disciplines including biology, medicine and pharmacy. While deep learning methods have progressively been implemented for the prediction of PPI sites within proteins, the task of enhancing their predictive performance remains an arduous challenge.

resultsIn this paper, we propose a novel PPI site prediction model (DGCPPISP) based on a dynamic graph convolutional neural network and a two-stage transfer learning strategy. Initially, we implement the transfer learning from dual perspectives, namely feature input and model training that serve to supply efficacious prior knowledge for our model. Subsequently, we construct a network designed for the second stage of training, which is built on the foundation of dynamic graph convolution.

conclusionsTo evaluate its effectiveness, the performance of the DGCPPISP model is scrutinized using two benchmark datasets. The ensuing results demonstrate that DGCPPISP outshines competing methods in terms of performance. Specifically, DGCPPISP surpasses the second-best method, EGRET, by margins of 5.9%, 10.1%, and 13.3% for F1-measure, AUPRC, and MCC metrics respectively on Dset_186_72_PDB164. Similarly, on Dset_331, it eclipses the performance of the runner-up method, HN-PPISP, by 14.5%, 19.8%, and 29.9% respectively.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningMachine LearningProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProteinsGraph convolutional networkPPI site predictionTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39085781
PMCPMC11293074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.