Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085677›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Tissue Engineered 3D Constructs for Volumetric Muscle Loss.

Sonal Gahlawat, Doga Oruc, Nikhil Paul, Mark Ragheb, Swati Patel, Oyinkansola Fasasi, Peeyush Sharma, David I Shreiber, Joseph W Freeman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hb-EGF directs systemic muscle repair.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sonal GahlawatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Doga OrucDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Nikhil PaulDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Mark RaghebDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Swati PatelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Oyinkansola FasasiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Peeyush SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
David I ShreiberDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Joseph W FreemanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, USA. jfreemn@soe.rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-9517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe injuries to skeletal muscles, including cases of volumetric muscle loss (VML), are linked to substantial tissue damage, resulting in functional impairment and lasting disability. While skeletal muscle can regenerate following minor damage, extensive tissue loss in VML disrupts the natural regenerative capacity of the affected muscle tissue. Existing clinical approaches for VML, such as soft-tissue reconstruction and advanced bracing methods, need to be revised to restore tissue function and are associated with limitations in tissue availability and donor-site complications. Advancements in tissue engineering (TE), particularly in scaffold design and the delivery of cells and growth factors, show promising potential for regenerating damaged skeletal muscle tissue and restoring function. This article provides a brief overview of the pathophysiology of VML and critiques the shortcomings of current treatments. The subsequent section focuses on the criteria for designing TE scaffolds, offering insights into various natural and synthetic biomaterials and cell types for effectively regenerating skeletal muscle. We also review multiple TE strategies involving both acellular and cellular scaffolds to encourage the development and maturation of muscle tissue and facilitate integration, vascularization, and innervation. Finally, the article explores technical challenges hindering successful translation into clinical applications.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansRegenerationBiomaterialsDecellularizationElectrospinningHydrogelsScaffoldsSkeletal muscle regenerationTissue engineeringVolumetric muscle loss

Identifiers

PMID39085677
PMCPMC11329418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.