Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085601›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2024

Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.

Samskruthi Reddy Padigepati, David A Stafford, Christopher A Tan, Melanie R Silvis, Kirsty Jamieson, Andrew Keyser, Paola Alejandra Correa Nunez, John M Nicoludis, Toby Manders, Laure Fresard and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Samskruthi Reddy PadigepatiInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
David A StaffordInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Christopher A TanInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Melanie R SilvisInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Kirsty JamiesonInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Andrew KeyserInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Paola Alejandra Correa NunezInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
John M NicoludisInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Toby MandersInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Laure FresardInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Yuya KobayashiInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Carlos L ArayaInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Swaroop AradhyaInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Britt JohnsonInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA.
Keith NykampInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA. keith.nykamp@invitae.com.
Jason A ReuterInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA. jason.reuter@invitae.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the adoption and scope of genetic testing continue to expand, interpreting the clinical significance of DNA sequence variants at scale remains a formidable challenge, with a high proportion classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Genetic testing laboratories have historically relied, in part, on functional data from academic literature to support variant classification. High-throughput functional assays or multiplex assays of variant effect (MAVEs), designed to assess the effects of DNA variants on protein stability and function, represent an important and increasingly available source of evidence for variant classification, but their potential is just beginning to be realized in clinical lab settings. Here, we describe a framework for generating, validating and incorporating data from MAVEs into a semi-quantitative variant classification method applied to clinical genetic testing. Using single-cell gene expression measurements, cellular evidence models were built to assess the effects of DNA variation in 44 genes of clinical interest. This framework was also applied to models for an additional 22 genes with previously published MAVE datasets. In total, modeling data was incorporated from 24 genes into our variant classification method. These data contributed evidence for classifying 4043 observed variants in over 57,000 individuals. Genetic testing laboratories are uniquely positioned to generate, analyze, validate, and incorporate evidence from high-throughput functional data and ultimately enable the use of these data to provide definitive clinical variant classifications for more patients.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMachine learningMAVEVariant classification

Identifiers

PMID39085601
PMCPMC11303574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.