Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085555›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

A survey of women diagnosed with breast cancer experiencing oncology treatment-induced hot flushes: identification of specific characteristics as predictors of hot flush occurrence, frequency, and severity.

Susan Gallagher, Alice Johnstone, Alysha De Livera, Deborah J Marsh, Sean Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan GallagherSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9730-9044
Alice JohnstoneSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-9751
Alysha De LiveraMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-4155
Deborah J MarshSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia. Deborah.Marsh@uts.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5899-4931
Sean WalshSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7033-8547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMore women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) are living with oncology treatment-induced hot flushes (HFs). This Australian-based survey explores why some women experience more severe or ongoing HF and whether specific population characteristics are predictive of HF occurrence, frequency, and/or severity.

methodsA non-probabilistic anonymous survey distributed online (Register4) and two Australian hospitals collected demographic and clinical information. Eligibility was consenting Australian-based women, 18 years and over, with a primary BC diagnosis. Analysis included linear and logistic regression models.

resultsA total of 324 survey responses were analyzed. Chemotherapy and hormone therapy were each associated with HF occurrence (aOR = 2.92, 95% CI [1.27, 6.70], p = 0.01; and aOR = 7.50, 95% CI [3.02, 18.62], p < 0.001) and in combination (aOR = 5.98, 95% CI [2.61, 13.69], p < 0.001). Increased self-reported anxiety at BC diagnosis was significantly associated with HF frequency and severity scores (aCO = 0.71, 95% CI [0.31, 1.12], p = 0.001; and aCO = 0.44, 95% CI [0.33, 0.55], p < 0.001). Postmenopausal women had significantly lower HF severity and frequency scores than premenopausal women (aCO = -0.93, 95% CI [-1.62, -0.25], p = 0.008; and aCO = -2.62, 95% CI [-5.14, -0.11], p = 0.041).

conclusionsWomen with BC receiving chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy and premenopausal or experiencing elevated anxiety and/or stress will likely experience more severe oncology treatment-related HFs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: HFs continue across the BC treatment trajectory with women >5-year survivorship still reporting life impacts, with premenopausal women at the time of BC diagnosis at higher risk of experiencing severe and more frequent oncology treatment-induced HFs than postmenopausal women. Women at high risk require information on methods to moderate HF potential life impacts and maintain treatment compliance.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsHot FlashesAdultAgedAustraliaCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic AgentsBreast neoplasms/cancerChemotherapyHormone therapyHot flashesHot flushesPredictive factorsSurveyVasomotor symptoms

Identifiers

PMID39085555
PMCPMC12906599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.