Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085531›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2024

Standardised and structured reporting in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: recommendations from the Fetal Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology.

Carmelo Sofia, Michael Aertsen, Catherine Garel, Marie Cassart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carmelo SofiaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Policlinico "G. Martino", Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98100, Messina, Italy. carm.sofia@tiscali.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6021-4658
Michael AertsenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU), Louvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-5365
Catherine GarelDepartment of Radiology, Armand-Trousseau Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-484X
Marie CassartDepartment of Radiology and Fetal Medicine, Iris South Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2766-1805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a valuable adjunct to prenatal ultrasound for evaluating fetal malformations. Several radiological societies advocate for standardised and structured reporting practices to enhance the uniformity of imaging language. Compared to narrative formats, standardised and structured reports offer enhanced content quality, minimise reader variability, have the potential to save reporting time, and streamline the communication between specialists by employing a shared lexicon. Structured reporting holds promise for mitigating medico-legal liability, while also facilitating rigorous scientific data analyses and the development of standardised databases. While structured reporting templates for fetal MRI are already in use in some centres, specific recommendations and/or guidelines from international societies are scarce in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to propose a standardised and structured reporting template for fetal MRI to assist radiologists, particularly those with less experience, in delivering systematic reports. Additionally, the paper aims to offer an overview of the anatomical structures that necessitate reporting and the prevalent normative values for fetal biometrics found in current literature.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrenatal DiagnosisDocumentationEuropeFemaleHumansPediatricsPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyRadiologyRadiology Information SystemsSocieties, MedicalBiometryFetusMagnetic resonance imagingPrenatalStructured report

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.