Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085495›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Effect of group online-based peer support intervention on psychological distress of adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Lijun Li, Yinglong Duan, Huan Cao, Xing Zhou, Yue Kang, Ziyu Wan, Dawei Huang, Jianfei Xie, Andy S K Cheng

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Online cancer forums and complementary and alternative medicine in cancer care: effects of ehealth literacy and psychological distress on use and attitudes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. "We are champions": an investigation on how cancer support group propels patient advocacy, voices, education, mentorship, and support.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lijun LiNursing Department, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yinglong DuanNursing Department, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huan CaoXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xing ZhouXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yue KangXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ziyu WanXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Dawei HuangDepartment of Information, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jianfei XieNursing Department, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. xiejianfei@csu.edu.cn.
Andy S K ChengSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82073409Wisdom Accumulation and Talent Cultivation Project of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University NO. BJ202205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients, aged between 15 to 39 years old, suffer from long-term psychological distress, confronting low self-efficacy and various psychological problems. This study constructs a group online-based peer support intervention combined with offline activities to explore its impact on the psychological distress of AYA cancer patients.

methodsA randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted in which 90 AYA cancer patients were recruited. The control group (N = 45) received conventional psychological care and treatment, and the experimental group (N = 45) received 8 weeks of an online peer support intervention. Outcome measures included psychological distress (Distress Thermometer, DT), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), perceived peer support (Cancer Peer Support Scales, CaPSS), and readiness for return to work (Readiness to Return-To-Work Scale, RRTW).

resultsEight-week peer support intervention was effective in improving psychological distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in the experimental group with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Time affected psychological distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in AYA cancer patients (P < 0.05), and there was an interaction with intervention factors (P < 0.05). The intervention has a positive effect on relieving the psychological status of AYA cancer patients. For readiness for return to work, the experimental group was in the preparation for the action-behavioral stage immediately, 1 month and 3 months after the end of the intervention (P < 0.01), supporting AYA cancer patients who have not returned to work to maintain optimal return-to-work readiness.

conclusionsThe group online-based peer support intervention is popular and has good scientificity, effectiveness, and practical significance for AYA cancer patients.

trial registrationThis study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (ChiCTR2100053091, registered on 10 November 2021).

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPeer GroupPsychological DistressSocial SupportAdolescentAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansInternet-Based InterventionMaleStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultAdolescent and young adultAYACancerOncologyPeer supportPsychological distressPsycho-oncology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.