ArticleScientific reports2024
SHAP based predictive modeling for 1 year all-cause readmission risk in elderly heart failure patients: feature selection and model interpretation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Metabolomics and Machine Learning Reveal Drying-Dependent Phenolic Markers in Asteraceae Edible Plants From Ulleungdo Island.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model based on routine clinical indicators for early identification of obesity-related non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a single-center retrospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Machine learning for predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with heart failure using an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study based on MIMIC-IV.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for predicting mechanical ventilation in Alzheimer's patients with pneumonia: a SHAP-guided XGBoost nomogram based on MIMIC-IV.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DSPONVNet: a multimodal deep learning model integrating intraoperative monitoring and clinical features for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting risk.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting synchronous lung metastasis in United States colorectal cancer patients: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting in-hospital bleeding after PCI in patients with diabetes and acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Predicting long-term hospital outcomes in older adults with the hospital frailty risk score: a nationwide study of repeated readmissions.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- An online interpretable machine learning model for predicting cardiometabolic multimorbidity risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Establishment and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk in acute myocardial infarction patients complicated with diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Associations between echocardiographic parameters and aerobic performance in young athletes.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Triglyceride-glucose index and hyperhomocysteinemia within a cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic biomarker network: insights from interpretable machine learning and epidemiological modeling.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Repeat Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning for oral frailty factors in hospitalized schizophrenia patients: two-stage feature selection and SHAP analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Clustering-Based Machine Learning Approach for Mortality Prediction in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Development and Validation.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Predicting the Risk of Burnout Syndrome Using Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS): A Machine Learning Approach.Safety and health at work · 2025Article
- Enhancing cardiovascular risk prediction in Asian populations: A machine learning approach integrated with digital health platforms.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Multiple Machine Learning Models Integrating Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Prediction of Hemorrhagic Transformation After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Machine learning models incorporating somatic and mental comorbidities for prolonged length-of-stay prediction in a maximum care university hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a significant global public health concern with a high readmission rate, posing a serious threat to the health of the elderly population. While several studies have used machine learning (ML) to develop all-cause readmission risk prediction models for elderly patients with HF, few have integrated ML-selected features with those chosen by human experts to assess HF patients readmission. A retrospective analysis of 8396 elderly HF patients hospitalized at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021 was conducted. Variables selected by XGBoost, LASSO regression, and random forest constituted the machine group, while the human expert group comprised variables chosen by two experienced cardiovascular professors. The variables selected by both groups were combined to form a human-machine collaboration group. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to elucidate the importance of each predictive feature, explain the impact of individual features on the model, and provide visual representation. A total of 73 features were included for model development. The human-machine collaboration model, utilizing CatBoost, achieved an AUC of 0.83617, an F1-score of 0.73521, and a Brier score of 0.16536 on the validation set. This model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to those created solely by human experts or machine. The SHAP plot was then used to visually display the feature analysis of the human-machine collaboration model, revealing HGB, NT-proBNP, smoking history, NYHA classification, and LVEF as the 5 most important features. This study indicate that the human-machine collaboration model outperforms those relying solely on human expert selection or machine algorithm at predicting all-cause readmission in elderly HF patients. The application of the SHAP method enhanced the interpretability of the model outcomes, aiding clinicians in accurately pinpointing risk factors associated with HF readmission. This advancement enables the formulation of tailored treatment strategies, offering a more personalized approach to patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.