Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085379›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Biophysical cartography of the native and human-engineered antibody landscapes quantifies the plasticity of antibody developability.

Habib Bashour, Eva Smorodina, Matteo Pariset, Jahn Zhong, Rahmad Akbar, Maria Chernigovskaya, Khang Lê Quý, Igor Snapkow, Puneet Rawat, Konrad Krawczyk and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Habib Bashour *Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. habib.bashour@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0001-6660-1843
Eva Smorodina *Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5457-5163
Matteo Pariset *Adaptyv Biosystems, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jahn Zhong *Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7247-1392
Rahmad AkbarDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-0876
Maria ChernigovskayaDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Khang Lê QuýDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Igor SnapkowDepartment of Chemical Toxicology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Puneet RawatDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Konrad KrawczykNaturalAntibody, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0697-5522
Geir Kjetil SandveDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-1409
Jose Gutierrez-MarcosSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-9080
Daniel Nakhaee-Zadeh GutierrezAdaptyv Biosystems, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jan Terje AndersenDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-1628
Victor GreiffDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. victor.greiff@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-5032

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing effective monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics faces a multi-parameter optimization challenge known as "developability", which reflects an antibody's ability to progress through development stages based on its physicochemical properties. While natural antibodies may provide valuable guidance for mAb selection, we lack a comprehensive understanding of natural developability parameter (DP) plasticity (redundancy, predictability, sensitivity) and how the DP landscapes of human-engineered and natural antibodies relate to one another. These gaps hinder fundamental developability profile cartography. To chart natural and engineered DP landscapes, we computed 40 sequence- and 46 structure-based DPs of over two million native and human-engineered single-chain antibody sequences. We find lower redundancy among structure-based compared to sequence-based DPs. Sequence DP sensitivity to single amino acid substitutions varied by antibody region and DP, and structure DP values varied across the conformational ensemble of antibody structures. We show that sequence DPs are more predictable than structure-based ones across different machine-learning tasks and embeddings, indicating a constrained sequence-based design space. Human-engineered antibodies localize within the developability and sequence landscapes of natural antibodies, suggesting that human-engineered antibodies explore mere subspaces of the natural one. Our work quantifies the plasticity of antibody developability, providing a fundamental resource for multi-parameter therapeutic mAb design.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalProtein EngineeringHumansProtein ConformationSingle-Chain AntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalSingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID39085379
PMCPMC11291509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.