ArticleScientific reports2024
Missed Follow-up is associated with worse survival in stage I lung cancer: results from a large multi-site academic hospital system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of insurance status among cancer patients and survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of GPT-4-Generated Discharge Letters on Patients' Medical Comprehension: Prospective Crossover Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Missed Clinic Appointments for Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Predictors of loss to follow-up after radiotherapy in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- C15ORF48 serves as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in pan-cancer with implications for lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of early incomplete follow-up on overall survival among stage I lung cancer patients. Patients with clinical stage I lung cancer at our institution between 2007 and 2016 were identified (N = 1111). Exclusions included < 18 years of age (N = 2), missing stage or demographics (N = 56), incomplete appointment data or had only one scheduled appointment (N = 351), or did not survive for at least 1 year after diagnosis (N = 120). Missed appointments were defined as unattended follow-up appointments within the first year of diagnosis without an attended appointment in the subsequent 60 days. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) for death associated per 10% increase in missed oncology follow-up appointments. Univariable and descriptive statistics were performed, and a multivariable landmark Cox regression model was created to examine the effect of missed oncology follow-up on survival. A total of 582 patients were analyzed with median follow-up of 3.2 years and median age of 69 years. On multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, race, insurance status, and definitive treatment type the HR for death was 1.44 (95% CI 1.05-1.97) for every 10% increase in missed appointments. Incomplete oncologic follow-up may negatively impact overall survival among survivors of early-stage lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.