Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085282›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

People follow motivation-structural rules when they react to synthetised sounds.

Beáta Korcsok, Tamás Faragó, Bence Ferdinandy, Ádám Miklósi, Péter Korondi, Márta Gácsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beáta Korcsok *HUN-REN-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary. beata.korcsok@ttk.elte.hu.
Tamás Faragó *Neuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence FerdinandyHUN-REN-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám MiklósiHUN-REN-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter KorondiDepartment of Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Márta GácsiHUN-REN-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 950159Hungarian Academy of Sciences via the János Bolyai Research Scholarship BO/751/20HUN-REN-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group 01 031National Research, Development, and Innovation Office grant K143595ÚNKP-22-5 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund ÚNKP-22-5-ELTE-475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotionally expressive vocalizations can elicit approach-avoidance responses in humans and non-human animals. We investigated whether artificially generated sounds have similar effects on humans. We assessed whether subjects' reactions were linked to acoustic properties, and associated valence and intensity. We generated 343 artificial sounds with differing call lengths, fundamental frequencies and added acoustic features across 7 categories and 3 levels of biological complexity. We assessed the hypothetical behavioural response using an online questionnaire with a manikin task, in which 172 participants indicated whether they would approach or withdraw from an object emitting the sound. (1) Quieter sounds elicited approach, while loud sounds were associated with avoidance. (2) The effect of pitch was modulated by category, call length and loudness. (2a) Low-pitched sounds in complex sound categories prompted avoidance, while in other categories they elicited approach. (2b) Higher pitch in loud sounds had a distancing effect, while higher pitch in quieter sounds prompted approach. (2c) Longer sounds promoted avoidance, especially at high frequencies. (3) Sounds with higher intensity and negative valence elicited avoidance. We conclude that biologically based acoustic signals can be used to regulate the distance between social robots and humans, which can provide an advantage in interactive scenarios.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationMotivationSoundAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcoustic communicationApproach-avoidance reactionEncoded social informationHuman–Robot interactionNon-verbal communicationSocial robotics

Identifiers

PMID39085282
PMCPMC11291635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.