ArticleMicrobes and environments2024
Polyethylene Biodegradation by an Artificial Bacterial Consortium: Rhodococcus as a Competitive Plastisphere Species.
Article in Microbes and environments, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plastic-Degrading Microorganisms: Biodegradation Pathways and Habitat Origins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Foundation for Advancing Studies of the Biodegradation of Polyethylene Surrogates by Environmental and Model Laboratory Microbes.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Harnessing bacterial power and omics technologies for sustainable plastic waste biodegradation.Biodegradation · 2026Review
- Screening and characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Functional and genomic characterization of polyethylene degrading yeast Meyerozyma carpophila M6.0.2 isolated from marine plastic debris in East Java Indonesia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microplastic pollution in the marine environment: Sources, impacts, and degradation.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyethylene (PE), a widely used recalcitrant synthetic polymer, is a major global pollutant. PE has very low biodegradability due to its rigid C-C backbone and high hydrophobicity. Although microorganisms have been suggested to possess PE-degrading enzymes, our understanding of the PE biodegradation process and its overall applicability is still lacking. In the present study, we used an artificial bacterial consortium for PE biodegradation to compensate for the enzyme availability and metabolic capabilities of individual bacterial strains. Consortium members were selected based on available literature and preliminary screening for PE-degrading enzymes, including laccases, lipases, esterases, and alkane hydroxylases. PE pellets were incubated with the consortium for 200 days. A next-generation sequencing ana-lysis of the consortium community of the culture broth and on the PE pellet identified Rhodococcus as the dominant bacteria. Among the Rhodococcus strains in the consortium, Rhodococcus erythropolis was predominant. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed multilayered biofilms with bacteria embedded on the PE surface. SEM micrographs of PE pellets after biofilm removal showed bacterial pitting and surface deterioration. Multicellular biofilm structures and surface biodeterioration were observed in an incubation of PE pellets with R. erythropolis alone. The present study demonstrated that PE may be biodegraded by an artificially constructed bacterial consortium, in which R. erythropolis has emerged as an important player. The results showing the robust colonization of hydrophobic PE by R. erythropolis and that it naturally possesses and extracellularly expresses several target enzymes suggest its potential as a host for further improved PE biodeterioration by genetic engineering technology using a well-studied host-vector system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.