Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085135›Full record

ArticleIndustrial health2024

Joint ICOH-WOPS & APA-PFAW global roundtable perspectives: exploring national policy approaches for psychological health at work through the 'National Policy Index' lens.

Rachael E Potter, Michael Ertel, Maureen F Dollard, Stavroula Leka, Aditya Jain, Loic Lerouge, Irene Houtman, Birgit Aust, Won-Jun Choi, Nicholas Crooks and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Generality of Psychosocial Safety Climate Theory-A Fundamental Element for Global Worker Well-Being: Evidence From Four Nations.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Rachael E PotterPsychosocial Safety Climate Global Observatory, Centre for Workplace Excellence, Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Australia.
Michael ErtelDivision Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Germany.
Maureen F DollardPsychosocial Safety Climate Global Observatory, Centre for Workplace Excellence, Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Australia.
Stavroula LekaSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Aditya JainNottingham University Business School, United Kingdom.
Loic LerougeFrench National Scientific Research Centre (CNRS), Centre for Comparative Labour and Social Security Law (COMPTRASEC), International Research Chair in Comparative Studies on Occupational Health at Work (CECST) GPR HOPE, Idex, University of Bordeaux, France.
Irene HoutmanNederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO (TNO), The Netherlands.
Birgit AustNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark.
Won-Jun ChoiDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Nicholas CrooksHealth and Safety Business Unit, WorkSafe Victoria, Australia.
John FitzgeraldWorkSafe New Zealand, New Zealand.
Siti Nurani HassanConsultation, Research & Development Department, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Malaysia.
Andrea Kirk-BrownMonash Business School, Peninsula Campus, Monash University, Australia.
Takenori MishibaDepartment of Law, Kindai University, Japan.
Ashley SpetchWorkSafe British Columbia, Canada.
Ulrich StoetzerRegulations, Market Surveillance and International Affairs, Swedish Work Environment Authority, Sweden.
Pieter VAN DijkMonash Business School, Peninsula Campus, Monash University, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worker psychological health is a significant global imperative that requires national policy action and stakeholder engagement. While national policy is a critical lever for improving worker psychological health, some countries are more progressive than others in relation to policy development and/or implementation. At the Joint Congress of the International Commission on Occupational Health, Scientific Committee on Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors and the Asia Pacific Academy for Psychosocial Factors at Work in Tokyo (September 2023), a Global Roundtable was held that to initiate international dialogue and knowledge exchange about national policy approaches for work-related psychological health. The Global Roundtable involved experts from diverse regions alongside an engaged audience of congress attendees and facilitators. Qualitative data were analysed against the five components of the National Policy Index tool comprising, policy priority, specific laws, nation-wide initiatives, sector-oriented initiatives, national survey and/or studies. Analysis revealed that while work-related psychological health is a policy priority across many countries, at the same time, there are global gaps in both legislation specificity and active regulation across different countries. For future policy development across countries, it will be beneficial to continue and deepen international discourse and for countries to share their approaches with others.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMental HealthOccupational HealthGlobal HealthHumansPolicy MakingWorkplaceMental healthPolicyPsychosocial risks

Identifiers

PMID39085135
PMCPMC11611528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.