ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH2024
Real-world retrospective analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Survival: Measuring Treatment Tolerability with Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Lymphoma Immunotherapy Era.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Immune-related adverse events in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors.British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are promising therapeutic agents for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (RRcHL). This retrospective study evaluated patients with RRcHL registered in the clinical research program Tohoku-Hematology-Forum-26, between 2016 and 2020, and treated with ICI in 14 centers in Northeast Japan. We analyzed the usage, efficacy, and safety of ICI therapy (ICIT). Among a total of 27 patients with RRcHL, 21 and nine were treated with nivolumab and/or pembrolizumab, respectively. The best response was complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease in 11 (40.8%), seven (25.9%), eight (29.6%), and one (3.7%) patient, respectively. In all patients undergoing ICIT, the 2-year progression-free survival and 2-year overall survival (OS) were 48.6% and 87.4%, respectively. The 2-year OS for patients with CR, PR, and SD were 100%, 68.6%, and 87.5%, respectively. A total of 36 events of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or immune-related like adverse events (irlAEs) were observed in 19 of the 27 patients (70.4%). Two thirds of these irAEs or irlAEs were grade 1-2 and controllable. During the observation period, ICIT was discontinued in 22 of 27 (81.4%) patients due to CR, inadequate response, irAE and patient circumstances in five (22.7%), seven (31.8%), eight (36.4%) and two patients (9.1%), respectively. Therapy-related mortality-associated irAE were observed in only one patient during ICIT. These results suggest that ICIT for RRcHL is effective and safe in real-world settings. The optimal timing of induction and duration of ICIT remains to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.