ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024
Ultrasonic Nakagami imaging for automatically positioning and identifying the treated lesion induced by histotripsy.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal ultrasound-based localization of surgical mesh using Nakagami parametric imaging and shear wave elastography-An in vitro and ex vivo study.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Correlation of ultrasound attenuation with proton density fat fraction across multiple organs in healthy volunteers.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Chirp-Coded Subharmonic Imaging With Volterra Filtering: Histotripsy Bubble Cloud Assessment In Vitro and Ex Vivo.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Preclinical studies of histotripsy for intracranial tumors.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histotripsy has been proposed as a non-invasive surgical procedure for clinical use that liquefies the tissue into acellular debris by utilizing the mechanical mechanism of bubbles. Accurate and reliable imaging guidance is essential for successful clinical histotripsy implementation. Nakagami imaging is a promising method to evaluate the microstructural change induced by high intensity focused ultrasound. However, practically, it is difficult for the Nakagami imaging to distinguish the treated lesion induced by histotripsy from the surrounding normal biological tissues. In this study, we introduce the use of noise-assisted correlation algorithm (NCA) in Nakagami images as a solution to suppress the background normal tissue and identify the treated lesion induced by histotripsy. Experiments are conducted on fresh porcine liver ex vivo by cavitation-cloud histotripsy. Results show that the contrast-to-noise ratio between the treated lesion and surrounding tissue corresponding to the Nakagami image after NCA and original Nakagami image is 3.434 and 0.505, respectively. The optimal artificial noise level is 1-fold of the background normal tissue amplitude, and the corresponding optimal threshold of correlation coefficient should be between 0.6 and 0.8 in the application of NCA. Therefore, the use of NCA in Nakagami image can suppress the background normal tissues without affecting the information of treated lesion for an appropriate artificial noise level and threshold used in the NCA. Moreover, the Nakagami images after the application of the NCA can also be used for automatically distinguishing and measuring the tissue fractionation accurately using binarization. The proposed Nakagami images overlaid on the B-mode images can provide a promising method for positioning and visualizing the treated lesion to achieve precise histotripsy treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.