Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39084872›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

'Everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is': a qualitative study of patient understandings and experiences of herpes zoster.

Sophie Rees, Matthew Ridd, Lorelei Hunt, Hazel Everitt, Anna Gilbertson, Robert Johnson, Anthony E Pickering, Oliver van Hecke, Vikki Wylde, Sian Wells and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Qualitative research and clinical trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sophie ReesBristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4399-2049
Matthew RiddCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-8823
Lorelei HuntBath, UK.
Hazel EverittSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-8403
Anna GilbertsonCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3946-9132
Robert JohnsonTranslational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8376-7412
Anthony E PickeringAnaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care Research, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0345-0456
Oliver van HeckeCentre for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-5057
Vikki WyldeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-1529
Sian WellsBristol Trials Centre, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5334-7599
Jonathan P BanksNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3889-6098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShingles (herpes zoster), caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, is usually diagnosed and managed in primary care. The lifetime risk of shingles in the general population is approximately 30%, and it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. There has been little qualitative research about patient experience and understanding of shingles.

aimTo explore patient experiences and understanding of shingles. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative interviews with people with shingles recruited from primary care in England.

methodQualitative semi-structured remote interviews were undertaken with 29 participants in a randomised controlled trial in primary care in England (ATHENA, ISRCTN14490832). Participants were aged >49 years and were diagnosed within 6 days of shingles rash onset. Interviewees were sampled for diversity in terms of pain, intervention adherence, age, gender, and ethnicity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsInterviews took place in November 2022 to April 2023. Participants' understanding of shingles was limited, particularly pre-diagnosis. A common theme was that 'everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is'. Television campaigns about the shingles vaccination programme helped some to recognise the rash. Shingles was understood as a disease with a variable prognosis, resulting in a sense of uncertainty about the significance when diagnosed. Participants reported a range of symptoms, which impacted on everyday life. Some people thought their diagnosis was caused by poor mental health or challenging life circumstances, a perception sometimes reinforced by healthcare professionals. Many participants sought meaning in their diagnosis, reflecting on, and sometimes changing, their life and circumstances.

conclusionPrimary care practitioners should be aware of the broad spectrum of patient knowledge, and the potential for better understanding to promote early attendance and treatment to reduce the impact of shingles.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHerpes ZosterAgedEnglandFemaleHerpes Zoster VaccineHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeHerpes Zoster Vaccinegeneral practicepainpatient experiencequalitative researchshingles

Identifiers

PMID39084872
PMCPMC11755566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.