Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39084408›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2024

Predicting inferior vena cava filter complications using machine learning.

Ben Li, Naomi Eisenberg, Derek Beaton, Douglas S Lee, Leen Al-Omran, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Mohamad A Hussain, Ori D Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial intelligence in clinical thrombosis and hemostasis: A review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ben LiDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Education in Medicine (T-CAIREM), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Naomi EisenbergDivision of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Derek BeatonData Science & Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Douglas S LeeDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; ICES, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Leen Al-OmranSchool of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Duminda N WijeysunderaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; ICES, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mohamad A HussainDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Ori D RotsteinDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Charles de MestralDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; ICES, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Muhammad MamdaniInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Education in Medicine (T-CAIREM), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Data Science & Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; ICES, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Graham Roche-NagleDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Mohammed Al-OmranDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Education in Medicine (T-CAIREM), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: mohammed.al-omran@unityhealth.to.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is associated with important long-term complications. Predictive models for filter-related complications may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict 1-year IVC filter complications using preoperative data.

methodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent IVC filter placement between 2013 and 2024. We identified 77 preoperative demographic and clinical features from the index hospitalization when the filter was placed. The primary outcome was 1-year filter-related complications (composite of filter thrombosis, migration, angulation, fracture, and embolization or fragmentation, vein perforation, new caval or iliac vein thrombosis, new pulmonary embolism, access site thrombosis, or failed retrieval). The data were divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Six ML models were trained using preoperative features with 10-fold cross-validation (Extreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was assessed using calibration plot and Brier score. Performance was evaluated across subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, median Area Deprivation Index, planned duration of filter, landing site of filter, and presence of prior IVC filter placement.

resultsOverall, 14,476 patients underwent IVC filter placement and 584 (4.0%) experienced 1-year filter-related complications. Patients with a primary outcome were younger (59.3 ± 16.7 years vs 63.8 ± 16.0 years; P < .001) and more likely to have thrombotic risk factors including thrombophilia, prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), and family history of VTE. The best prediction model was Extreme Gradient Boosting, achieving an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.94). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.65). Calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted/observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.07. The top 10 predictors of 1-year filter-related complications were (1) thrombophilia, (2) prior VTE, (3) antiphospholipid antibodies, (4) factor V Leiden mutation, (5) family history of VTE, (6) planned duration of IVC filter (temporary), (7) unable to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation, (8) malignancy, (9) recent or active bleeding, and (10) age. Model performance remained robust across all subgroups.

conclusionsWe developed ML models that can accurately predict 1-year IVC filter complications, performing better than logistic regression. These algorithms have potential to guide patient selection for filter placement, counselling, perioperative management, and follow-up to mitigate filter-related complications and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMachine LearningVena Cava FiltersAdultAgedDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsComplicationsInferior vena cava filterMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID39084408
PMCPMC11523346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.