Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39084085›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2024

Telehealth development in the WHO European region: Results from a quantitative survey and insights from Norway.

Monika Knudsen Gullslett, Elettra Ronchi, Lene Lundberg, Dillys Larbi, Karianne F Lind, Maryam Tayefi, Phuong Dinh Ngo, Tyrone Reden Sy, Keyrellous Adib, Clayton Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Digital exclusion in healthcare services: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Review
  8. Barriers and enablers for health system reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Monika Knudsen GullslettNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Elettra RonchiDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO, Europe.
Lene LundbergNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Dillys LarbiNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Karianne F LindNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Maryam TayefiNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Phuong Dinh NgoNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.
Tyrone Reden SyDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO, Europe.
Keyrellous AdibDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO, Europe.
Clayton HamiltonDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO, Europe. Electronic address: hamiltonc@who.int.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic sent shock waves through societies, economies, and health systems of Member States in the WHO European Region and beyond. During the pandemic, most countries transitioned from a slow to a rapid adoption of telehealth solutions, to accommodate the public health and social measures introduced to mitigate the spread of the disease. As countries shift to a post-pandemic world, the question remains whether telehealth's importance as a mode of care provision in Europe continues to be significant.

objectiveThis paper aims to present, synthesize, and interpret results from the Telehealth Programmes section of the 2022 WHO Survey on Digital Health (2022 WHO/Europe DH Survey). We specifically analyze the implementation and use of teleradiology, telemedicine, and telepsychiatry. Norwegian telehealth experiences will be used to illustrate survey findings, and we discuss some of the relevant barriers and facilitators that impact the use of telehealth services.

methodsThe survey tool was revised from the 2015 WHO Global Survey on eHealth, updated to reflect recent progress and policy priorities.The 2022 WHO/Europe DH Survey was conducted by WHO and circulated to Member States in its European Region from April to October 2022.

resultsThe data analysis revealed that teleradiology, telemedicine, and telepsychiatry are the telehealth services most commonly used in the WHO European Region in 2022. Funding remains the most significant barrier to the implementation of telehealth in the Region, followed by infrastructure and capacity/human resources. The survey results highlighted in this study are presented in the following sections: (1) telehealth strategies and financing, (2) telehealth programmes and services offered by Member States of the WHO European Region, (3) barriers to implementing telehealth services, and (4) monitoring and evaluation of telehealth.

conclusionBased on WHO's 2022 survey, the use of telehealth in the WHO European Region is on the rise. However, merely having telehealth in place is not sufficient for its successful and sustained use for care provision. Responses also uncovered regional differences and barriers that need to be overcome. Successful implementation and scaling of telehealth requires rethinking the design of health and social care systems to create robust, trustworthy, and person-centred digital health and care services.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineWorld Health OrganizationEuropeHumansNorwayPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39084085
PMCPMC11413481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.