Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39083790›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Capturing Usability Problems for People Living With Dementia by Applying the DEMIGNED Principles in Usability Evaluation Methods: Mixed Methods Study.

Thomas Engelsma, Simone Heijmink, Heleen M A Hendriksen, Leonie N C Visser, Afina W Lemstra, Monique W M Jaspers, Linda W P Peute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas EngelsmaeHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8889-1669
Simone HeijminkeHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-1922-371X
Heleen M A HendriksenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4040-6959
Leonie N C VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-7938
Afina W LemstraAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8933-3260
Monique W M JasperseHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8040-9153
Linda W P PeuteeHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9859-0912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia-related impairments can cause complex barriers to access, use, and adopt digital health technologies (DHTs). These barriers can contribute to digital health inequities. Therefore, literature-based design principles called DEMIGNED have been developed to support the design and evaluation of DHTs for this rapidly increasing population.

objectiveThis study aims to apply the DEMIGNED principles in usability evaluation methods to (1) capture usability problems on a mobile website providing information resources for people visiting a memory clinic, including those living with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia, and (2) investigate the realness of usability problems captured by the DEMIGNED principles in expert testing, specifically for mobile websites that act as a means of providing DHTs.

methodsFirst, a heuristic evaluation was conducted, with the DEMIGNED principles serving as domain-specific guidelines, with 3 double experts (experienced in both usability and dementia) and 2 usability engineering experts. Second, think-aloud sessions were conducted with patients visiting a memory clinic who were living with SCD, MCI, or dementia.

resultsThe heuristic evaluation resulted in 36 unique usability problems. A representative sample of 7 people visiting a memory clinic participated in a think-aloud session, including 4 (57%) with SCD, 1 (14%) with MCI, and 2 (29%) with dementia. The analysis of the think-aloud sessions revealed 181 encounters with usability problems. Of these encounters, 144 (79.6%) could be mapped to 18 usability problems identified in the heuristic evaluation. The remaining 37 (20.4%) encounters from the user testing revealed another 10 unique usability problems. Usability problems frequently described in the think-aloud sessions encompassed difficulties with using the search function, discrepancies between the user's expectations and the content organization, the need for scrolling, information overload, and unclear system feedback.

conclusionsBy applying the DEMIGNED principles in expert testing, evaluators were able to capture 79.6% (144/181) of all usability problem encounters in the user testing of a mobile website for people visiting a memory clinic, including people living with dementia. Regarding unique usability problems, 50% (18/36) of the unique usability problems identified during the heuristic evaluation were captured by the user-testing sessions. Future research should look into the applicability of the DEMIGNED principles to other digital health functionalities to increase the accessibility of digital health and decrease digital health inequity for this complex and rapidly increasing population.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHeuristicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedUser-Computer Interfacedementiadesign principlesdigital healthmemory clinicmobile phoneusability evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39083790
PMCPMC11325128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.