Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39083601›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Recurrent inhibition refines mental templates to optimize perceptual decisions.

Ke Jia, Mengxin Wang, Cecilia Steinwurzel, Joseph J Ziminski, Yinghua Xi, Uzay Emir, Zoe Kourtzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ke JiaAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310013, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5498-8952
Mengxin WangDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8476-9145
Cecilia SteinwurzelDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2396-2742
Joseph J ZiminskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-6868
Yinghua XiInterdisciplinary Institute of Neuroscience and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Uzay EmirPurdue University School of Health Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9441-7832

Funding

Wellcome Trust 223131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translating sensory inputs to perceptual decisions relies on building internal representations of features critical for solving complex tasks. Yet, we still lack a mechanistic account of how the brain forms these mental templates of task-relevant features to optimize decision-making. Here, we provide evidence for recurrent inhibition: an experience-dependent plasticity mechanism that refines mental templates by enhancing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated (GABAergic) inhibition and recurrent processing in superficial visual cortex layers. We combine ultrahigh-field (7 T) functional magnetic resonance imaging at submillimeter resolution with magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the fine-scale functional and neurochemical plasticity mechanisms for optimized perceptual decisions. We demonstrate that GABAergic inhibition increases following training on a visual (i.e., fine orientation) discrimination task, enhancing the discriminability of orientation representations in superficial visual cortex layers that are known to support recurrent processing. Modeling functional and neurochemical plasticity interactions reveals that recurrent inhibitory processing optimizes brain computations for perpetual decisions and adaptive behavior.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMagnetic Resonance ImagingVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMaleNeuronal PlasticityVisual PerceptionYoung Adultgamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID39083601
PMCPMC11290482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.