ArticlePloS one2024
Single nucleotide and copy number variants of cancer driver genes inform drug response in multiple cancers.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CCDC137: A key hub for RNA and epigenetic regulation in cancer research (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Machine learning in oncological pharmacogenomics: advancing personalized chemotherapy.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the heterogeneity of cancer, precision medicine has been a major challenge for cancer treatment. Determining medication regimens based on patient genotypes has become a research hotspot in cancer genomics. In this study, we aim to identify key biomarkers for targeted therapies based on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) of genes. The experiment is carried out on 7 cancers on the Encyclopedia of Cancer Cell Lines (CCLE) dataset. Considering the high mutability of driver genes which result in abundant mutated samples, the effect of data sparsity can be eliminated to a large extent. Therefore, we focus on discovering the relationship between driver mutation patterns and three measures of drug response, namely area under the curve (AUC), half maximal effective concentration (EC50), and log2-fold change (LFC). First, multiple statistical methods are applied to assess the significance of difference in drug response between sample groups. Next, for each driver gene, we analyze the extent to which its mutations can affect drug response. Based on the results of multiple hypothesis tests and correlation analyses, our main findings include the validation of several known drug response biomarkers such as BRAF, NRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, and CDKN2A, as well as genes with huge potential to infer drug responses. It is worth emphasizing that we identify a list of genes including SALL4, B2M, BAP1, CCDC6, ERBB4, FOXA1, GRIN2A, and PTPRT, whose impact on drug response spans multiple cancers and should be prioritized as key biomarkers for targeted therapies. Furthermore, based on the statistical p-values and correlation coefficients, we construct gene-drug sensitivity maps for cancer drug recommendation. In this work, we show that driver mutation patterns could be used to tailor therapeutics for precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.