Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39083402›Full record

ArticleCyberpsychology, behavior and social networking2024

Associations of Social Factors and Self-Efficacy with Skin-Self Examination Intentions Among Hispanics at Risk for Skin Cancer and Their Preferences for Digital Interventions.

Zhaomeng Niu, Carolyn J Heckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhaomeng NiuDepartment of Health Informatics, Rutgers School of Health Professions, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-5992
Carolyn J HeckmanDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

Developing and testing a mobile health intervention to promote sun protection behaviors and skin examination among HispanicsR00MD016435 · NIMHD · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Zhaomeng Niu · 2024 to 2026
$743k
Developing and testing a mobile health intervention to promote sun protection behaviors and skin examination among HispanicsK99MD016435 · NIMHD · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NIU, ZHAOMENG · 2022 to 2023
$251k
NIMHD NIH HHS K99 MD016435NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD016435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer ranks as the most prevalent cancer in the United States. Over the past two decades, the incidence of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, among Hispanics has risen by 20%. Melanoma mortality rates are higher in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Early detection of melanoma via skin self-examination may lead to diagnosis of melanoma at an earlier stage, when they are thinner, less invasive, and more easily treatable, resulting in improved survival rates. Given the gap in research addressing culturally relevant factors related to skin cancer prevention and detection among Hispanics and informed by the Preventive Health Model, this study tested the associations between social and normative factors and self-efficacy with thorough skin self-examination (TSSE) intentions and queried participants about their preferences for skin cancer-related interventions. Among respondents (

Indexed as

Hispanic or LatinoIntentionSelf EfficacySelf-ExaminationSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceUnited Statesdigital interventionhealth disparitiesHispanicsprovider-patient communicationself-efficacyskin cancersocial norms

Identifiers

PMID39083402
PMCPMC11693949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.