Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39083274›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Deep Learning Analysis of Surgical Video Recordings to Assess Nontechnical Skills.

Rayan Ebnali Harari, Roger D Dias, Lauren R Kennedy-Metz, Giovanna Varni, Matthew Gombolay, Steven Yule, Eduardo Salas, Marco A Zenati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. From innovation to implementation: Addressing the AI adoption gap in cardiac surgery.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rayan Ebnali HarariMass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Roger D DiasMass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren R Kennedy-MetzDepartment of Psychology, Roanoke College, Salem, Virginia.
Giovanna VarniDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Matthew GombolaySchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Steven YuleDepartment of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eduardo SalasDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
Marco A ZenatiMass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Developing Standardized Intraoperative Process Models to Enhance Surgical SafetyR01HL126896 · NHLBI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ZENATI, MARCO A. · 2016 to 2023
$3.7M
Intelligent Perfusion Digital Twin to Improve Patient Safety and Quality in Cardiac SurgeryR01HL157457 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Roger Daglius Dias, Matthew Gombolay · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126896NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Assessing nontechnical skills in operating rooms (ORs) is crucial for enhancing surgical performance and patient safety. However, automated and real-time evaluation of these skills remains challenging. Objective: To explore the feasibility of using motion features extracted from surgical video recordings to automatically assess nontechnical skills during cardiac surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used video recordings of cardiac surgical procedures at a tertiary academic US hospital collected from January 2021 through May 2022. The OpenPose library was used to analyze videos to extract body pose estimations of team members and compute various team motion features. The Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) assessment tool was employed for rating the OR team's nontechnical skills by 3 expert raters. Main Outcomes and Measures: NOTSS overall score, with motion features extracted from surgical videos as measures. Results: A total of 30 complete cardiac surgery procedures were included: 26 (86.6%) were on-pump coronary artery bypass graft procedures and 4 (13.4%) were aortic valve replacement or repair procedures. All patients were male, and the mean (SD) age was 72 (6.3) years. All surgical teams were composed of 4 key roles (attending surgeon, attending anesthesiologist, primary perfusionist, and scrub nurse) with additional supporting roles. NOTSS scores correlated significantly with trajectory (r = 0.51, P = .005), acceleration (r = 0.48, P = .008), and entropy (r = -0.52, P = .004) of team displacement. Multiple linear regression, adjusted for patient factors, showed average team trajectory (adjusted R2 = 0.335; coefficient, 10.51 [95% CI, 8.81-12.21]; P = .004) and team displacement entropy (adjusted R2 = 0.304; coefficient, -12.64 [95% CI, -20.54 to -4.74]; P = .003) were associated with NOTSS scores. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests a significant link between OR team movements and nontechnical skills ratings by NOTSS during cardiac surgical procedures, suggesting automated surgical video analysis could enhance nontechnical skills assessment. Further investigation across different hospitals and specialties is necessary to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceDeep LearningVideo RecordingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperating RoomsPatient Care Team

Identifiers

PMID39083274
PMCPMC11292454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.