ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
Virulent shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 ST11 isolated from ground beef in Brazil.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, virulence profiling, and latent antimicrobial resistance determinants ofVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Whole genome sequencing-based characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from raw beef in selected butcher shops in Addis Ababa and Burayu, Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia Coli O157 in Moroccan food and antimicrobial resistance profiles of the strains isolated.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Metagenomic Insights into the Diverse Antibiotic Resistome of Non-Migratory Corvidae Species on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a total of 248 ground beef samples were analyzed for the presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Out of these samples, only one (0.4%) tested positive for STEC. Further analysis using PCR confirmed the presence of all tested genes associated with STEC, including stx1, stx2, eae, ehx, uid, rfbO157, and fliCH7 in this isolate. Interestingly, no STEC strains were detected in the remaining 100 beef cut samples or the 100 chicken cut samples, indicating the absence of detectable STEC contamination in those specific samples. The isolated strain exhibited significant cytotoxic activity in Vero cells, indicating its ability to produce cytotoxic Shiga toxins. To further investigate the strain, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analyses were performed. The resistome analysis revealed the absence of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes, indicating a pan-susceptible phenotype. However, this strain presented chromosomal mutations in gyrA, gyrB, parC, parE, pmrA, pmrB, and folP. Plasmid analysis identified the presence of two plasmids, namely IncFIB(AP001918) and IncFII. The multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) identified the strain as belonging to sequence type (ST) 11, which is associated with E. coli O157:H7 strains. The virulome analysis confirmed the presence of several canonical virulence markers, including stx1, stx2, eae-g01-gamma, ehxA, stx1a-O157, and stx2a-O157. Overall, this study identified for the first time a rare occurrence of STEC contamination in ground beef, with the isolated strain belonging to the highly virulent O157:H7 serotype. These findings contribute to our understanding of STEC prevalence and characteristics in food samples, highlighting the importance of effective food safety measures to prevent potential health risks associated with STEC contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.