ReviewJapanese journal of ophthalmology2024
The progress and future of corneal endothelial transplantation.
Review in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between subjective symptoms and severity in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Risk factors for postoperative endothelial keratoplasty after cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Strategies for Differentiation of Corneal Endothelial Cells From Stem Cells: Current Advances and Challenges.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Bioengineering Strategies for Corneal Endothelial Cell Injection Therapy: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Repeat Expansion and Somatic Instability in TCF4 in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Identified by Small Pool PCR.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Corneal Morphological and Optical Parameters in Predicting DSAEK Surgery Outcome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Bilateral Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Report.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endothelial transplantation has recently been accepted worldwide, in the long history of corneal transplantation. The introduction of endothelial keratoplasty (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) has enabled us to expand the surgical indications owing to the low incidence of rejection and quick recovery of visual function. New technologies have been developed to ensure stable postoperative outcomes with a shorter learning curve, such as transplantation using cultured human endothelial cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) or new devices such as artificial endothelium. This review discusses the history and characteristics of corneal transplantation alongside new treatment options that may offer hope for patients with endothelial disease in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.