ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2024
Phylogenetic and morphological re-evaluation of Camptophora.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genetic variety and habitats of Camptophora species, generally known as black yeast, have not been clarified. In this study, we re-evaluated Camptophora based on morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses. Because prior investigations on Camptophora only included a few strains/specimens, 24 Camptophora-related strains were newly obtained from 13 leaf samples of various plant species to redefine the genetic and species concepts of Camptophora. Their molecular phylogenetic relationships were examined using small subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nSSU, 18S rDNA), the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA operon, the large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (LSU, 28S rDNA), β-tubulin, the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (rpb2), and mitochondrial small subunit DNA (mtSSU). Single- and multi-locus analyses using nSSU-ITS-LSU-rpb2-mtSSU revealed a robust phylogenetic relationship among Camptophora species within Chaetothyriaceae. Camptophora species could be distinguished from other chaetothyriaceous genera by their snake-shaped conidia with microcyclic conidiation and loosely interwoven mycelial masses. Based on the results of phylogenetic analyses, two undescribed lineages were recognized, and Ca. schimae was excluded from the genus. ITS sequence comparison with environmental DNA sequences revealed that the distribution of the genus is restricted to the Asia-Pacific region. Camptophora has been isolated or detected from abrupt sources, and this was attributed to its microcycle. The mechanisms driving genetic diversity within species are discussed with respect to their phyllosphere habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39083124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.