Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39083121›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Comparison of analgesia nociception index, surgical pleth index and hemodynamic parameters between patients receiving fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine analgesia for supratentorial craniotomy - an open label active-controlled randomized trial.

Rakesh T L, Shwethashri Kondavagilu Ramaprasannakumar, Dhritiman Chakrabarti, Kamath Sriganesh, Sonia Bansal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rakesh T LDepartment of Neuroanethesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, 560029, India.
Shwethashri Kondavagilu RamaprasannakumarDepartment of Neuroanethesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, 560029, India.
Dhritiman ChakrabartiDepartment of Neuroanethesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, 560029, India.
Kamath SriganeshDepartment of Neuroanethesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, 560029, India.
Sonia BansalDepartment of Neuroanethesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, 560029, India. itz.sonia77@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine decreases heart rate (HR) and increases high frequency (HF) component of HR variability (HRV). Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) measures nociception by analyzing the influence of respiration on HF component of HRV while surgical pleth index (SPI) derives this information from photoplethymographic signals of finger arterioles. Therefore, during administration of dexmedetomidine, reliability of ANI may vary. This study compared the changes in ANI, SPI and hemodynamics (HR and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) during various noxious stimuli with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine intraoperative analgesia. In this trial, patients undergoing elective supratentorial surgery under general anesthesia were randomized to receive either fentanyl or dexmedetomidine infusion for intraoperative analgesia. ANI (instantaneous and mean), SPI, HR and MAP were compared before and after noxious stimuli (intubation, skull pin insertion, skin incision and craniotomy) with respect to magnitude of maximum change in the variable and the time taken for the maximal change (defined as response time) between the groups. A total of 58 patients, 29 in each group were recruited into the study. At intubation, SPI changed significantly more in the fentanyl group compared to dexmedetomidine group (37 versus 20 units, p = 0.007). At skull pinning, ANI values (both instantaneous and mean) changed more in dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.024 and 0.009) with significantly longer response time (p = 0.039). There was no difference between the groups with respect to any of the variables at skin incision and craniotomy. ANI during use of dexmedetomidine and SPI while using fentanyl, might be the better choices as intraoperative nociception monitors.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaCraniotomyDexmedetomidineFentanylNociceptionAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeReproducibility of ResultsDexmedetomidineFentanylAnalgesia nociception indexDexmedetomidineMonitorNociceptionOpioid free anesthesiaSurgical pleth index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.