ReviewNeurosurgical review2024
Advancements in prognostic markers and predictive models for intracerebral hemorrhage: from serum biomarkers to artificial intelligence models.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can artificial intelligence accurately predict the risk of hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage? A systematic review and Meta-analysis of 7,665 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Immuno-metabolic biomarkers for 90-day prognostication after acute ischemic stroke: a classically solved QUBO-COPE modeling and biological contextualization study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- The role of stem cells and their engineering strategies in the repair of nerve damage in intracerebral hemorrhage.Cell & bioscience · 2026Review
- Red Blood Cell-Derived Exosomes Deliver Complement C5 to Exacerbate Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Inflammation · 2026Article
- Assessing performance, calibration, and explainability of machine learning versus traditional models for early outcome prediction after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Clinical, radiological, and radiomics feature-based explainable machine learning models for prediction of neurological deterioration and 90-day outcomes in mild intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Serum Peroxiredoxin 2 as a Biochemical Indicator for Reflecting Severity and Prognosticating Stroke-Associated Pneumonia, Early Neurological Deterioration and Poor Neurological Outcomes in Acute Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Observational Analytical Clinical Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
- Automatic classification and prognosis prediction of cerebral hemorrhage based on a deep learning model.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with high morbidity and mortality, accounting for 10-15% of all strokes globally. Recent advancements in prognostic biomarkers and predictive models have shown promise in enhancing the prediction and management of ICH outcomes. Serum sestrin2, a stress-responsive protein, has been identified as a significant prognostic marker, correlating with severity indicators such as NIHSS scores and hematoma volume. Its levels predict early neurological deterioration and poor prognosis, offering predictive capabilities comparable to traditional measures. Furthermore, a deep learning-based AI model demonstrated superior performance in predicting early hematoma enlargement, with higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional methods. Additionally, long-term outcome prediction models using CT radiomics and machine learning have achieved high accuracy, particularly with the Random Forest algorithm. These advancements underscore the potential of integrating novel biomarkers and advanced computational techniques to improve prognostication and management of ICH, aiming to enhance patient care and survival rates. The incorporation of serum sestrin2, AI, and machine learning in predictive models represents a significant step forward in the clinical management of ICH, offering new avenues for research and clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39083096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.